Data firms must improve transparency

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 12, 2020

A public breakup between the Climate Corp. and Tillable is a cautionary tale for companies that manage agricultural data for farmers.

The Climate Corp.’s FieldView platform manages planting, spraying and harvest production data, while Tillable is an online land-leasing marketplace that connects farmers to landlords.

Last October, the two companies announced a partnership that would allow FieldView customers to share their production information with Tillable’s digital platform.

The service was to be opt-in, so FieldView users would have to choose to share information with Tillable, just as they can with other FieldView platform partners.

Read Also

editorial cartoon

Proactive approach best bet with looming catastrophes

The Pan-Canadian Action Plan on African swine fever has been developed to avoid the worst case scenario — a total loss ofmarket access.

Then in February 2020, Tillable sent letters to farmland owners with cash offers to rent their land.

Many farmers both rent and own farmland and some saw this campaign as a threat to the acres they already rent. They questioned how Tillable came to the cash amounts in the letters, which in some cases were close to hitting the market value.

Some farmers became convinced Tillable’s offer letters were related to the data-sharing arrangement with FieldView, and they took to social media to communicate their displeasure.

Climate FieldView chief executive officer Mike Stern said no data was exchanged, and that farmers would have had to opt in to share their data once the platforms became connected.

Tillable CEO Corbett Kull said the company used publicly available information, such as tax information and average county yields to come up with the dollar amounts in the land-lease offers.

But it didn’t matter if information was ever exchanged because the idea of suspicious activity took root on social media.

Climate Corp. cancelled the platform integration agreement with Tillable.

There are plenty of companies and people who would love to get their hands on farmers’ production information, so companies that manage this information must clearly demonstrate they will not share it without consent.

But FieldView already does this, so companies may need to go further than promising discretion.

Companies that handle farmers production data may also need to look into third party verification of their customer contracts, such as Ag Data Transparent.

About the author

Robin Booker

Robin Booker

Robin Booker is the Editor for The Western Producer. He has an honours degree in sociology from the University of Alberta, a journalism degree from the University of Regina, and a farming background that helps him relate to the issues farmers face.

explore

Stories from our other publications