But surely you mean canola? – Editorial Notebook

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: June 13, 2002

Winnipeg reporter

“Evidently Humpty Dumpty was very angry, though he said nothing for a

minute or two. When he did speak again, it was in a deep growl.

” ‘It is a most provoking thing,’ he said at last, ‘when a person

doesn’t know a cravat from a belt!'”

– from Through the Looking Glass

Alice couldn’t tell the difference between Humpty Dumpty’s neck and

waistline. That’s what led her into trouble, and you really couldn’t

Read Also

A variety of Canadian currency bills, ranging from $5 to $50, lay flat on a table with several short stacks of loonies on top of them.

Agriculture needs to prepare for government spending cuts

As government makes necessary cuts to spending, what can be reduced or restructured in the budgets for agriculture?

blame her because the giant egg man was rather rotund.

On a recent trip I took to the United Kingdom, my British relatives in

a number of locations faced an equally unsettling and embarrassing

situation with me, and you really couldn’t blame them for my haughty

and offended reaction because it wasn’t very rational.

It involved an oilseed, which you might think is an odd thing to be

discussing on holiday. But my relatives, knowing I work for a farm

newspaper, often spoke about farming in their country and wanted to

know about farming in Canada.

As soon as they mentioned the word “rapeseed” as one of the crops

farmers grow, I would interject with a pointed question about whether

they meant “canola.”

This would sow confusion and awkwardness into the conversation, because

they didn’t know what I was talking about, and the scientific, dietary

and historical difference between rapeseed and canola wasn’t all that

interesting to them.

But I made them sit through tiresome descriptions of how the original

rapeseed plant had been modified by Canadians to become the crop we now

grow, and that’s why we now call it canola.

I’m sure they were thinking “Let’s get off this topic” as I was

rattling on, and afterwards I would wonder why I was getting so wound

up about it.

I guess it comes from a deep sense of grievance about Canada not

getting credit for one of its great inventions, and my seeing in the

refusal of foreigners to adopt the new name a conspiracy to deny us our

due. It’s just like the British pretending that Lennox Lewis is an

Englishman, when Canada took him fair and square from Jamaica.

I hope my British relatives remember me as someone other than a bore

who got oddly worked up about agricultural nomenclature.

But sometimes you just have to fight for what’s right, even if it seems

a bit silly. Perhaps that’s what Humpty was thinking.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

explore

Stories from our other publications