Sask. looks at surface rights

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: April 21, 2022

This time the government is consulting on amending a couple of acts to give the surface rights arbitration board more power to enforce orders and the energy and resources ministry more power to take further action if board orders aren’t followed. | File photo

Saskatchewan is once again looking at its surface rights legislation, seven years after pulling a proposed bill to modernize the 1968 act.

This time the government is consulting on amending a couple of acts to give the surface rights arbitration board more power to enforce orders and the energy and resources ministry more power to take further action if board orders aren’t followed.

Scott Owens, vice-president with the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan, said the amendments would be a good start in addressing the most pressing issue for landowners.

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

“What’s been happening probably the last seven years since the price of oil went down and companies have been struggling, they simply don’t pay landowners their rent and the arbitration board has no mechanism to enforce payment,” he said.

On his farm in northwestern Saskatchewan’s energy patch, Owens said one company fell behind in payments before catching up.

“The other one, I went I think four years with no payments and any effort to contact a representative of the company was unsuccessful. They just ghosted everybody that tried to reach them,” he said. “However, that company has since been bought by a solvent, reputable company and they just started operating and catching up on bills that were left in arrears.”

That isn’t the case for all companies and landowners, though.

Owens said some companies couldn’t pay but it’s likely that some realized that they wouldn’t be penalized if they didn’t.

There are also some wording changes and smaller amendments under consideration, including an update to the amount companies have to pay for damage such as lost crop or a fence. The maximum is currently $1,000.

The consultation is open until May 6.

After the last consultation in 2013 a bill appeared on the legislative order paper in December 2014 but was never introduced. It was withdrawn in March 2015.

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications