Revitalization report rejects status quo

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 2, 2002

Rural Saskatchewan is ready for change, says the co-chair of a

committee that spent nearly two years seeking ways to revitalize the

province outside of its two largest cities.

“Our take on the situation is the majority of the people in the

province realize we have to do something,” Audrey Horkoff told an April

29 news conference to mark the release of the Action Committee on the

Rural Economy’s final report.

“We concluded beyond doubt that the status quo was not an option.”

Read Also

Man charged after assault at grain elevator

RCMP have charged a 51-year-old Weyburn man after an altercation at the Pioneer elevator at Corinne, Sask. July 22.

The committee recommended a variety of ways to increase economic

activity, including tax incentives, infrastructure improvement and the

development of stronger livestock and organic industries.

For example, ACRE urged the provincial government to explore the

potential of a special youth tax structure.

The idea is to help young people struggling with the burden of student

loans, starting a business or having a young family, but who want to

stay in the province or move here.

“We felt if they could feel that Saskatchewan was a tax-friendly place

and with the job opportunities that we hope to create here, it would

look attractive,” Horkoff said.

Other taxation recommendations include the establishment of a credit

for value-added processing, consistent taxation in all rural

municipalities, use of fuel tax exclusively for road maintenance and

construction, and alleviation of the education tax burden on farmland.

The committee also recommended an attitude adjustment.

Its report said people view Saskatchewan as “a dead end with no future

and a terrible place to be” and chastises the media for highlighting

negative stories, such as 30 farmers occupying the legislative

building, and ignoring positive ones, like the attendance of 1,400

farmers at a soil conservation conference. Both events occurred around

the same time.

The final report highlights 40 priority recommendations made by eight

sub-committees in six areas: competitiveness; skills development;

infrastructure; sector specific; facilitating change; and research and

development.

About 150 other recommendations will be examined later.

A call on the province to remove residency requirements for Canadian

citizens who want to own Saskatchewan farmland did not make the

priority list.

Agriculture minister Clay Serby said the government would use the ACRE

recommendations as the basis for a strategy it will announce this

summer.

“Since ACRE’s recommendations touched on virtually all of government,

we have established a working group in government that will represent

all of the key department and agencies,” he said.

He noted the strategy will be long-term.

“I don’t think anyone is under the impression that rural revitalization

will be an easy task or one that will happen overnight.”

But Horkoff said some things do have to happen quickly, which is why

many of the recommendations focus on simplifying processes.

“It’s taking us too long and it’s costing too much money to get a plan

off the ground,” she said.

The ACRE process cost $640,000. The committee had a four-year budget of

$800,000, but fast-tracked its work at Serby’s request.

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications