Ideal fertilizer strategy involves homework

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: March 14, 2002

Farmers should consider the possibility of lower yields this year and

fertilize based on realistic expectations, say crop researchers.

A dry fall and winter have left grain farmers in much of Alberta,

Saskatchewan and some parts of Manitoba with little soil moisture.

Brent Flaten, a soil fertility specialist with Alberta Agriculture in

Stettler, said farmers must plan according to their own situations, but

this year the best choice may be to cut back on initial crop inputs.

Read Also

thumb emoji

Supreme Court gives thumbs-up emoji case the thumbs down

Saskatchewan farmer wanted to appeal the court decision that a thumbs-up emoji served as a signature to a grain delivery contract.

Flaten said farmers should fertilize to a targeted yield level, but if

they have seen two or more dry years, they may want to carefully

consider those targets.

“When things are dry and dollars tight, farmers need to be sure of

exactly what they have (in the field) and then start making decisions,”

he said, adding soil testing is more important than ever.

“Lots of growers have been putting on phosphorus for 20 or 30 years.

This year, they may have enough and be able to cut back … crops that

didn’t yield well last year will have left residual (nitrogen). Farmers

may be able to save there as well,” he said.

Brian Fowler, plant breeder and winter cereal researcher with the

University of Saskatchewan, said the university’s test plots have shown

elevated levels of residual nitrogen because of last year’s drought.

“You have to do the spring soil test. In conditions like these very

little can be taken for granted,” he said.

Microbial activity in dry soil is low because of the lack of moisture,

so fertilizer is not easily converted for plant use.

“So until we get some moisture, you need to base your expectations on

true test results,” he said.

“It’s a tough decision to make. You want a good crop, but you don’t

want to tie up money in the soil that won’t provide returns this

season.”

Fowler recommended placing enough nitrogen to start the crop and

provide a reasonable yield based on the soil moisture, plus realistic

expectations of rain.

“If it rains you can always (top dress) the crop with more N,” he said.

Flaten agreed.

“You can add (nitrogen) to the soil after timely rains and before the

flag leaf gets too high and still affect yield. After the flag leaf is

up it will only increase protein,” he said.

Applying nitrogen as anhydrous ammonia can be effective even in dry

soils but only if the soil doesn’t break up and clump too much, he

said.

“The anhydrous can gas off then.”

Top dressing nitrogen before seeding can mean losing nitrogen into the

air if limited moisture is present.

“Banding in liquid (nitrogen) can be very effective, as can granular,

provided it gets it (nitrogen) away from the air,” he said.

Larry Gusta of the U of S said leaving plants short of nutrients can

lead to disease or poor protein levels if timely rains do arrive.

“It’s a double-edged sword. If you fertilize too much and there is some

moisture at seeding then you get too much biomass for the plant to

support if it doesn’t keep raining. That’s a disaster. If you fertilize

too little, you lose the yield, the protein and plants are vulnerable

to disease,” he said.

In some cases, it might be worthwhile to skip seeding completely this

year, said Adrian Johnston, a researcher with the Potash and Phosphate

Institute of Canada.

“For some producers in the really dry areas it will come down to making

a decision about even whether to crop or chem fallow this year. But

most seem to be ready to go to the field and they need to plan for what

they have,” he said.

Flaten said it depends on the producer.

“Are you an optimist or a pessimist? Either way, it pays to be

informed.”

About the author

Michael Raine

Managing Editor, Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications