Food safety perception can cloud reality

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 7, 2002

Farmers and farm groups need to get a stronger message out to the

public about farming practices and food safety, says a University of

Guelph professor.

Doug Powell told a Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association meeting

in Regina that public perception and reality don’t always correspond.

He said the investigation into the water contamination that killed

seven people in Walkerton, Ont., determined that cattle did not cause

the E. coli outbreak.

“The farm was not at fault at all,” Powell said.”The fault is clearly

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

somewhere else.”

But that’s not necessarily what the public believes.

He said he doesn’t blame media for that.

“I think they can only respond to people who are there to be quoted,”

Powell said.

“It’s probably more useful for farm groups like this to take stronger

steps to reach out and get their message out there.”

Lack of knowledge

He said consumers don’t know enough about their food.

When they are asked which food is safest, they rate natural and organic

food highest, followed by food from grocery stores.

At the bottom of the list is food that has been irradiated.

That list is probably exactly opposite of what is true, Powell said.

The debate over genetically modified food is another good example of

the difference between perception and reality, he added.

He referred to a survey that found 70 percent of Canadians thought

crops sprayed with pesticides had been genetically modified.

He said growers have to explain to the public what they are doing and

why.

“Let people know what’s involved in farming,” he said.

“People can handle the discussion of risks and tradeoffs. They’re aware

of the tradeoffs. They do it every day.”

Powell said people perceive genetically modified food to be risky when

in fact they have been tested far more than conventional or organic

food.

“We don’t have any data on what people eat right now,” he said.

“Scientifically, organic foods are neither healthier nor safer than

conventional or genetically modified products. Some studies show

(organic food) has the highest level of those good old natural toxins.”

Powell said consumers have the right to make choices and find out

what’s in their food, but he believes labelling should be voluntary.

“Sticking a label on everything is not necessarily meaningful,

especially when that label is designed to alarm, not inform.”

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications