Your reading list

Education tax still bugs RMs

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 21, 2002

Chuck Jacques thrust his finger twice at the podium 15 metres away.

“Farmers aren’t opposed to paying property taxes for education. Right

now, Mr. Minister, farmers in my (rural municipality) are paying more

than $20,000 per student per year for each child in our school and your

department plans to close us. Then we’d pay more than $20,000 per child

and have no school,” said the reeve from the RM of Norton.

Jacques was highlighting the plight of the Pangman, Sask., school,

Read Also

Left to right: Fred Greig, Cathey Day and Kim McConnell, recipients of this year's Certificate of Merit awards from the Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences at the University of Manitoba. Photo: Submitted

University of Manitoba honours three agricultural alumni

Cathey Day, Fred Greig and Kim McConnell were chosen for the University of Manitoba’s 2025 certificates of merit from the agricultural and food sciences faculty.

which is threatened with closure.

But his comments addressed the larger issue of why many farmers say

Saskatchewan’s education tax is unfair.

Jacques’ comments to education minister Jim Melenchuk came during the

Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities mid-term convention

held in Saskatoon on Nov. 14-15.

The issue of the education portion of Saskatchewan’s municipal property

taxes and the rate farmers pay compared to urban dwellers sparked a

movement two years ago within RMs to withhold tax payments from the

province. While few failed to make their payments, the protest was

widely supported in the farm community.

“If grain prices were better it might not be as important to them right

now,” Neal Hardy, a reeve from Hudson Bay, Sask., and SARM president,

told the 900 delegates to the convention.

“But the fact is that it is an unfair way of paying for education.”

A SARM-commissioned report on the subject was presented at the

convention.

It showed that while farm size increased 32 percent in the past 20

years, education taxes doubled. Each farmer not only paid more for each

acre of land he owned, but many also paid on more acres.

Ken Perlych, a Lethbridge-based consultant, wrote the report.

Hardy feels the government has been too slow to change the method of

taxation for education.

“The government is not anxious to say to the other taxpayers in

Saskatchewan that they need to pay more. So we wait,” he said.

Melenchuk said the reliance on property tax for education is unfair and

after the new provincial property assessment is completed in 2005, the

province will act to “have a long-term fix for this problem.

“We are looking at a new property assessment system that takes into

account income and revenue streams and the effect they will have on tax

revenue and fairness,” said the minister.

One of the “fixes” was a commitment from the minister to solve the

problem that 18 of the 95 school divisions receive no money from the

province for operations. The divisions are entirely rural and pay more

to the province than they receive.

SARM passed two education tax resolutions during its two day meeting.

Both called for a reinstatement of the tax rebate system that expired

this year.

They also called on the government to increase that rebate from 25

percent to 40 percent, to exempt home quarter sections and to deduct

the rebate at the ratepayer level.

About the author

Michael Raine

Managing Editor, Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications