Disease risk sticky point in import plan

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: July 11, 2002

OTTAWA – A discussion of bluetongue and anaplasmosis by 50 cattle

disease experts and industry officials June 20-21 emerged with a plan

that might lead to year-round imports of feeder cattle from northern

U.S. states.

The two diseases are at the heart of animal health concerns and trade

tensions between Canada and the United States.

The Canadian Animal Health Coalition will now establish two groups –

one comprising cattle producers, Canadian Food Inspection Agency

officials and other key players, and another broader group that will

Read Also

An aerial view of Alberta's Crop Development Centre South, near Brooks.

Alberta crop diversification centres receive funding

$5.2 million of provincial funding pumped into crop diversity research centres

advise and comment on proposals created.

The groups will devise proposals to change regulations and allow feeder

cattle to enter Canada year-round, as long as they come from northern

states considered low risk for the two diseases.

“Nobody wants to expose our industry to unnecessary risk,” Arno

Doerksen of the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association told the special

summit on animal diseases.

“But I really think this is a matter of balancing risk. I think that

our fears, our concerns, our worries can be eliminated by good

information.”

Risk of disease is the official reason U.S. feeder imports have so far

been restricted to the October to April period, when ticks that carry

bluetongue and anaplasmosis cannot survive. Both are blood-borne

diseases that can only affect ruminants.

The CCA has been pushing for year-round access with no requirement for

extra testing. It proposes that animals be given shots of tetracycline

at the border as a precaution.

The CCA sees year-round U.S. access as a way to ease trade tensions and

maintain the lucrative American market for Canadian cattle and beef.

But CFIA rejected the proposal this spring, citing concerns over

potential for microbial resistance and protection of Canada’s herd

health status.

Another proposal has been submitted since, which the agency is now

reviewing, said CFIA official Brian Jamieson. He said the agency will

likely ask the CCA for revisions.

“Our role is to facilitate trade providing it can be done safely,” he

told the group.

In two days of talk on the two diseases, participants heard about the

prevalence and transmission of bluetongue and anaplasmosis, how each is

diagnosed and treated. Risk management, antimicrobial resistance,

economics and study results were also discussed.

Consultant Norm Willis summarized the meeting this way: “The

application of the mitigating factors, while not absolute, seem to me

to be a reasonable approach to minimize risk to an acceptable level.”

About the author

Barb Glen

Barb Glen

Barb Glen is the livestock editor for The Western Producer and also manages the newsroom. She grew up in southern Alberta on a mixed-operation farm where her family raised cattle and produced grain.

explore

Stories from our other publications