Castration vaccine ‘superb’ but funding hampers progress

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: November 14, 2002

A vaccine as an option to common animal castration methods has been

kept on the laboratory shelf by expense and regulatory hurdles.

More than 10 years ago, the Veterinary Infectious Disease Organization

in Saskatoon began working on a way to replace traditional castration

with a process that made animals allergic to their own fertility.

“Reduced time for producers to castrate animals, reduced stress on the

animals, no weight loss after castration, which takes place with (other

methods) and reduced risk of infection,” are potential benefits, said

Read Also

Spencer Harris (green shirt) speaks with attendees at the Nutrien Ag Solutions crop plots at Ag in Motion on July 16, 2025. Photo: Greg Berg

Interest in biological crop inputs continues to grow

It was only a few years ago that interest in alternative methods such as biologicals to boost a crop’s nutrient…

Chris Huxsoll, a researcher at the University of California at Davis

who has continued work on immunocastration.

“We have also found that immunocastrated animals grow faster than other

steers. With our immunization procedure, carcass quality and aggressive

behaviour are similar between immunocastrated animals and steers

(conventionally cut).”

Huxsoll said immunocastration has not caught on partly because of

problems with the adjuvant that is needed to deliver the genetically

modified vaccine.

“More research will provide alternatives for delivery. I believe there

may be a way to overcome the cost and adjuvant limitations of our

current vaccine if I can obtain funding for further research.”

John Kastelic, an Agriculture Canada livestock scientist in

Lethbridge, has also studied the concept and agreed that the product

may have potential if the cost of development and licensing can be

overcome.

“The vaccine itself is superb,” Kastelic said. “We got great results in

testing, and its design is really unique and so effective.”

The drug, created by Biostar, a former VIDO spinoff, stops the

reproductive process early in the chain of physiological events that

result in the development of a sexually mature animal.

Sex hormones initially develop high in the brain at the hypothalamus. A

tiny, vulnerable, 10-amino acid peptide called GnRH, or

gonadotropin-releasing hormone, is released from the hypothalamus in

minute amounts and travels within the brain to the pituitary gland.

Like a micro switch that triggers a larger switch, the pituitary

releases greater amounts of hormones, which in turn trigger other

glandular releases of even larger volumes. These hormones result in

development of mature sexual organs and systems.

The immunocastration vaccine turns the animal’s immune system against

the GnRH, stopping the chain of events.

The vaccine is created by attaching the GnRH molecule to a few foreign

molecules that can easily be identified as being out of place in the

body. The animal’s immune system will then take exception to any GnRH

that it finds and wipe it out.

“Stopping the process so very early on is incredibly effective,”

Kastelic said.

Murray Jelinski, who used to be involved with Biostar, said creating a

vaccine such as the GnRH inhibitor is relatively inexpensive once the

gene sequence is known. The difficulty comes in the product evaluation

stage.

While vaccines that fight illness move quickly through the federal

approval system, Jelinski said drugs such as an immunocastration

vaccine take considerably more time and expense because they change

animals’ physiology.

“I’m sad to say we haven’t done much with the cattle side of the

research,” said Jelinski, whose company MetaMorphix owns the part of

BioStar that developed the vaccine.

“We’ve been working on it with cats. Companion animals are seen to have

a much greater potential market. The biotech sector is under a lot

pressure from the markets these days and we are no exception. We are

being very prudent in our approach to research.”

Jelinski said the product still requires research before it can be

submitted to Health Canada.

“We found it was difficult to get a good long-term immune response with

bovines, but that isn’t to say with some more work it wouldn’t be

there.”

He said the vaccine’s vulnerability makes it safe for human

consumption. Even if it survived in meat as a residue, he said, it

would be destroyed in the digestive tract.

About the author

Michael Raine

Managing Editor, Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications