A proposed solar project containing about 435,000 panels that was slated for a site near a lake listed as one of Canada’s most important areas for birds has been rejected by the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC).
The 1,500-acre Foothills Solar Project was to have been built near Frank Lake east of High River, Alta. However, sunlight reflecting off the panels could be confused for water by migratory and breeding birds, causing them to be killed or injured, said conservation specialist Ruiping Luo of the Alberta Wilderness Association (AWA).
“It’s a sensitive area that should be protected, and while we understand that there needs to be solar development for Alberta to approach its net-zero carbon goals… we think that where these solar development projects are sited is really important and they shouldn’t be sited in very sensitive landscapes or very vulnerable areas for wildlife.”
Read Also
Ag In Motion 2025 site hub of activity
day before Ag in Motion preview.
The 150-megawatt Foothills Solar Project would have been the largest such development by Elemental Energy Renewables Inc. in Alberta, with the surface area of the solar panels totalling 270 to 300 acres. Director of project development Dan Eaton did not immediately respond to an email April 21 requesting comment.
The project was slated to be constructed by company subsidiary Foothills Solar GP Inc. on privately owned cultivated and hay pastureland in Foothills County, said a report by the AUC detailing its decision April 20. One partner in the initiative was Cold Lake First Nations, which governs five reserves in northeastern Alberta.
The AUC found the project could have positive socioeconomic benefits for these communities, helping promote Indigenous reconciliation with the Crown, said the report.
“Foothills Solar submitted that the project would be in the public interest for a variety of reasons, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions and other local economic benefits…. However, the potential for the project to result in high bird mortalities, and the impacts of the project on the Frank Lake IBA and the social and environmental values that it represents are unacceptable.”
IBA stands for Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas program, which is an international conservation initiative co-ordinated by BirdLife International. It described Frank Lake as the most important wetland in southwestern Alberta for breeding waterbirds.
A wildlife directive by the Alberta government said solar projects shouldn’t occur within 1,000 metres of a named lake or water body. However, about 50 percent of the Foothills Solar Project was directly sited within the IBA, with about 80 percent within the recommended setback from the IBA boundary, said the report.
Species that use Frank Lake and the surrounding area range from trumpeter and tundra swans to peregrine falcons and short-eared owls. Waterfowl such as ducks often use nearby land such as cultivated fields to nest and feed, said Luo.
She hoped the AUC’s decision will create an important precedent for future renewable energy development in sensitive habitats.
Rural Albertans are currently grappling with a boom in industrial-sized solar and wind projects. Agriculture and Irrigation
Minister Nate Horner said March 21 the provincial government plans to look at ways to balance renewable energy development with protecting farmland.
“There’s going to be a big consultation in this province regarding renewables, regarding agricultural land, regarding our electricity grid. It’s complicated, it’s big, it’s going to involve at least five ministries.”
The provincial government needs to place a moratorium on solar projects on certain types of farmland, said Paul McLauchlin, president of the Rural Municipalities of Alberta, during an earlier interview. It should especially halt projects on land with irrigation potential involving Class 1 or Class 2 soil, he said.
Luo said the AWA mostly agreed that prime farmland needs to be protected because of concerns ranging from the impact on the environment to the importance of food production.
“If there’s drought conditions, especially with climate change, we might be losing some of our more productive lands,” she said.
“So, there is this idea that solar panels and renewable energy shouldn’t be sited on areas that have a lot of productive, fertile soil, and we think that the best sites for these are usually brownfields. They’re usually industrial areas that have already been developed and that aren’t being used for other purposes.”
Contact doug.ferguson@producer.com
