Medical study creates uncertainty for PMU farmers

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: August 1, 2002

WAYWAYSEECAPPO, Man. – The last thing pregnant mare’s urine producers

needed was an attack on the industry that could undermine its very

foundation.

But that’s what equine ranchers are dealing with since a recent

American scientific study challenged the safety of hormone replacement

therapy for post-menopausal women. Some forms of this therapy use

hormones extracted from pregnant mare’s urine.

The study involved more than 16,000 post-menopausal women and began in

1997. It was testing a new form of hormone replacement therapy that

Read Also

The nose of a CN train engine rounding a corner is in the foreground with its grain cars visible in the background.

Canada-U.S. trade relationship called complex

Trade issues existed long before U.S. president Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again tariffs came along, said panelists at a policy summit last month.

included horse urine-derived estrogen.

It was called off recently, after slightly more than five years,

because the scientists conducting it found that women taking hormone

replacement therapy were experiencing higher rates of heart disease

and breast cancer.

No one knows what the impact of the study’s findings will be.

“It’s not an equine rancher’s situation,” said Manitoba PMU producer

Fred Clement, who is also president of the North American Equine

Ranching Information Council, which represents PMU producers.

“It’s a medical situation. We don’t have any specialized medical

knowledge ourselves.”

Clement said PMU producers are optimistic at the moment. Studies often

contradict each other and swing back and forth in their findings, and

he doesn’t think this particular study, which has received a lot of

media attention, is necessarily the last word.

“It’s just another clinical finding, as far as I’m concerned.”

Pharmaceutical manufacturer Wyeth Ayerst, which uses estrogen in

pregnant mare’s urine to make medicine, had increased the amount of

urine it will buy from producers for the coming 2002-03 season before

the recent spate of bad news.

That led farmers to expand their barns and herds to meet increased

demand.

Theodora Samiotis, a spokesperson for Wyeth Ayerst, said her company

sees the situation as “business as usual” and is committed to hormone

replacement therapy.

Since PMU producers have contracts with the company for the coming

season, Clement said they can sit back and wait to see whether there is

any lasting effect on the business.

“I’ve already got my contract in place for this year,” he said. “What

happens down the road is not something I can control.”

NAERIC spokesperson Carrie Allen said producers don’t make

pharmaceuticals and don’t have direct contact with consumers. They have

to rely on signals they get from Wyeth Ayerst.

“It’s business as usual until we can get a handle on demand for the

product.”

The recent study, which laid out complex findings, is not something PMU

producers are in a position to analyze.

“We have no idea how to interpret it,” she said. “It’s wait and see.”

Allen said reporters from across North America have been bombarding

NAERIC to find out what the study means for PMU producers. She isn’t

able to give a clear answer because she doesn’t know.

Clement said producers are wondering, too.

“It sure got everyone’s attention, that’s for sure.”

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications