Your reading list

Manitoba focuses on long-term road spending

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 9, 2002

Farmers are happy the Manitoba government is boosting long-term road

funding and trying to get rid of the patchwork quilt approach to

transportation planning, say rural representatives.

“We think it’s very useful with the change in grain transportation

traffic to get the municipalities involved in identifying the strategic

roads that lead into the strategic highways that have to be developed

for grain movement,” said Stu Briese, president of the Association of

Manitoba Municipalities.

“With the declining population in rural areas, we’re maintaining roads

Read Also

The nose of a CN train engine rounding a corner is in the foreground with its grain cars visible in the background.

Canada-U.S. trade relationship called complex

Trade issues existed long before U.S. president Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again tariffs came along, said panelists at a policy summit last month.

in our municipalities that maybe we have to take a second look at,”

said Briese.

“Maybe we have to develop some market roads to a higher standard to

move grain through our municipalities and put less money into some of

the other roads.”

Manitoba transportation minister Steve Ashton announced the province

will spend a minimum of $120 million per year for five years on road

and highway construction. That is an increase of 16 percent over recent

highway funding.

It will also launch a planning process in which people who rely on the

road system, including farmers, will be able to develop a five-year

plan for highway spending.

Traditionally, highway spending has been in two-year horizons, which

has made it difficult to plan big projects or entice road builders to

participate.

Now, spending plans will be more attractive to road builders,

especially in rural areas, said Les Felsch, the chair of Keystone

Agricultural Producers highway and safety committee.

“This is a great idea. Most organizations have five-year plans. I’m

surprised it took the government so long to come up with one,” said

Felsch.

Road builders, once they know that a long-term building project is

planned for rural Manitoba, will be willing to haul their machinery out

to an area in the spring, and leave it there over winter, rather than

pay to haul their equipment out. The cost of hauling equipment to and

fro across the province every year has been a disincentive to road

builders, Felsch said.

The $120 million per year is firm, Ashton said, even if the federal

government provides less road funding in future. Until last year the

federal government has not provided direct roads funding, the minister

said. But now there are a couple of programs, including the prairie

grain roads program, that are injecting federal cash into the

transportation system.

Ashton said any new federal road spending will go directly to road

construction, rather than being swallowed by general revenues.

The province’s new spending commitment is only half of what the

transportation department says it needs to maintain the present system,

Ashton said.

That’s why the federal government needs to give up more of the gas

taxes it collects to the provincial governments. Manitoba would get

another $25 to $30 million in annual road spending, Ashton said, if the

federal government handed over the 1.5 cents per litre deficit

reduction tax it collects for a deficit that no longer exists.

Manitobans will soon be asked for their input on the government’s

transportation strategy.

About the author

Ed White

Ed White

Markets at a glance

explore

Stories from our other publications