Ag ministers talk safety nets

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 7, 2002

Agriculture ministers plan to meet in Toronto during the last week of

November to discuss safety net programs for next year.

Saskatchewan minister Clay Serby recently told reporters that his

Ontario counterpart, Helen Johns, is organizing the one-day meeting

that he had called for in October.

“I’ve talked to all of the ag ministers across the country,” he said.

“They’ve all agreed to come.”

Serby said Johns is trying to find a meeting date that would

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

accommodate federal minister Lyle Vanclief and Bob Friesen, president

of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture and chair of the national

safety net advisory committee.

Two weeks ago, Serby and Saskatchewan farm groups met in Regina to

prepare.

“(We are) talking about Saskat-chewan’s position in terms of what we

need in a new agricultural policy framework safety net risk management

package, given that the federal government is not putting one new penny

into safety nets,” Serby said during a break in the meeting.

“As much as they talk about how they’ve enriched it, we’ve got pretty

much the same package of money to work with for the next five years as

we’ve had in the past.”

He said Vanclief’s recent statement that bilateral negotiations would

take place with provinces that had signed the APF was “one of the most

goofiest comments” he has heard.

Serby said if it is a national program, it should be negotiated that

way. Saskatchewan has not signed the APF.

He also criticized Vanclief for comments he made during an Oct. 7

emergency debate in the House of Commons. Vanclief said some provinces

– Saskatchewan in particular – don’t spend as much on agriculture as

they did in the past and should make it a priority.

Serby said information from Vanclief’s own department shows that

Saskatchewan supports its farmers four times more per capita than

Ottawa does.

“Secondly, he doesn’t talk much about the fact that it’s his government

that’s reduced the level of support for provinces,” he said. “Provinces

today pick up a far larger percentage of the cost share than ever.”

Serby said Vanclief’s performance during the debate was “dismal.”

But Vanclief stood firm in his opinion.

“I can show you the figures that over the last number of years,

Saskatchewan has gone from as high as 11 percent of provincial

expenditures on agriculture down to as low as five,” he said in Ottawa.

“That’s happened in the past 10 or 12 years. They’re now at around six

or maybe seven.”

According to budget documents for 2002-03, Saskatchewan spends five

percent of its general revenue fund on agriculture.

About the author

Karen Briere

Karen Briere

Karen Briere grew up in Canora, Sask. where her family had a grain and cattle operation. She has a degree in journalism from the University of Regina and has spent more than 30 years covering agriculture from the Western Producer’s Regina bureau.

explore

Stories from our other publications