Pool structure plans proceed

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: August 8, 2002

Saskatchewan Wheat Pool has taken the first step in its efforts to gain

control of decisions concerning ownership limits and board member

appointments.

On July 30, the pool’s board of directors agreed to ask delegates at a

special fall meeting to approve changes that would allow the company to

appoint board members who are not farmer delegates and allow single

investors to own more than 10 percent of the company. Class B

shareholders will be asked to approve the same changes at a Dec. 19

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

shareholders meeting.

Ownership limits and board member appointments are now governed by

Saskatchewan legislation.

The pool plans to ask the provincial government to give it control of

these areas, but first two-thirds of delegates and class B shareholders

must approve the changes.

This will likely prompt a flurry of lobbying this summer at kitchen

tables, grain

elevators and coffee shops.

Pool leaders say they are confident they will win approval to go ahead

with the changes.

David Schroeder, an analyst who watches the Canadian grain industry for

Dom-inion Bond Rating Service, said both moves will help the pool

“modernize or become more progressive in the eyes of the marketplace.”

Pool chief executive officer Mayo Schmidt said being able to appoint

board members with banking or legal expertise would improve the board’s

decision-making ability.

“We don’t need anyone else with agricultural experience,” Schmidt said.

“Our directors have a solid understanding of ag. We need it in other

areas. It is a large and complex company. It would also improve our

flexibility.”

Pool president Marvin Wiens said share ownership was originally limited

to 10 percent when the company began selling public shares in 1996. It

was intended in part to “get support for the (share offering). It was a

big step for the members.” It was also intended to quell fears of a

takeover by a larger company.

“We aren’t talking now about a total removal of the cap. What the new

cap might be we haven’t decided. This would only give the board control

over these decisions … and the flexibility to make decisions more

quickly as opportunities arise.”

Pool legal adviser Susan Engle said the changes would give the board

increased rights to make changes to the ownership cap and appoint

non-farmer delegates to the board of directors.

“This will not affect voting rights,” she said.

Voting rights would still be held only by Class A shareholders and

their delegates, she added.

Schmidt said the changes would open the possibility of working with

other industry partners, but that “any material change in control (of

the company) would require delegate approval.”

Schroeder said partnerships and takeovers are both welcomed and feared

by pool members and the market.

“Further consolidation would not be a bad thing for the industry. Pool

refers to strategic alliances. It isn’t always clear what that means,

but working with other companies can only help the pool.”

Wiens said he expects the vote will pass and that the pool will ask the

legislature to pass the amendment to the act as soon as the government

sits in the spring of 2003.

About the author

Michael Raine

Managing Editor, Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications