Cash shortage foils yield goals

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: June 28, 2013

Scrimping on inputs | Company provides money to farmers whose capital is tied up in land

Farmers are grossly undercapitalized despite making more money, says a firm that provides growers with capital for inputs in return for a share of their future production.

Brad Farquhar, vice-president of Assiniboia Capital Corp. and the recently formed Input Capital Corp., said farming has become incredibly expensive.

He called it the biggest impediment holding back the Canadian grain industry.

He said growers facing rising input costs, escalating land values and sky-high equipment prices can’t afford to farm the way they should.

Farquhar figures a farmer is undercapitalized if he doesn’t have the working capital to spend $300 per acre per year on his crops.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

That is why western Canadian farmers are unable to come close to realizing the 60 to 80 bushel per acre yield potential contained in canola genetics, he added.

“The (Saskatchewan) provincial average is about 28 bu. per acre,” Farquhar told Breadbasket 2.0, a conference organized by Canada’s Public Policy Forum.

Farquhar said it has become difficult for a farmer who wants to expand his operation to buy land in smaller increments, such as a half section.

“Expansions are becoming chunkier.”

Instead, growers are forced to buy 3,000 to 5,000 acres when a neigh-bour leaves the business. With money tied up servicing land debt, farmers tend to scrimp on fertilizer and other inputs.

They’re also confronted by the huge expense of buying out their parents when they retire.

“How many industries do you know that have to recapitalize themselves every generation?” said Farquhar.

Input Capital Corp. was formed to address the undercapitalization issue. The company makes an up-front cash payment to farmers in exchange for the right to buy at a fixed price a portion of their production for an extended period of time.

That way the farmer has the cash he needs to grow a 50 bu. canola crop.

However, a young farmer at the conference said Farquhar and one of his companies are partially to blame for the undercapitalization predicament. The grower said companies such as Assiniboia Capital are forcing farmers to compete for land with the pre-tax investment dollars of city doctors and lawyers who provide Assiniboia with its capital.

“Do you see there being a backlash from the farm community towards organizations such as your own?” asked the grower.

Assiniboia Capital owns 115,000 acres of Saskatchewan farmland, which it bought on behalf of 800 investors.

The company has delivered an average annual return of 20 percent per year to investors since it started buying land in 2005 due to appreciation of the property.

“Some of those original investors have more than tripled their money,” said Farquhar.

He said Assiniboia has analyzed Saskatchewan farmland sales data and has a clear conscience about its activities in the province.

“The top value transactions are taking place between farmers themselves,” said Farquhar.

A grower will pay a premium for land that goes up for sale next to his own land, while Assiniboia is “agnostic as to location.”

“It is farmers who are your biggest competition and driving up prices,” Farquhar told the young farmer.

Farquhar said Canadian agriculture hasn’t been much of a draw for institutional investors. A 2007 study identified 427 publicly traded Canadian oil and gas companies on the stock exchange, more than 1,300 mining companies but only six publicly traded agribusiness firms.

“In agriculture, we’ve tended to over-rely on government to fund infrastructure investment in agriculture,” he said.

Investors have traditionally shied away from Canadian agriculture because of its reliance on supply management, marketing boards and restrictive farmland ownership laws.

The negative perception is slowly changing as some of those barriers fall by the wayside. Farquhar sees a lot more Canadian pension funds and institutional investors showing up at agricultural investment conferences lately.

“That’s an encouraging development for a company like ours.”

About the author

Sean Pratt

Sean Pratt

Reporter/Analyst

Sean Pratt has been working at The Western Producer since 1993 after graduating from the University of Regina’s School of Journalism. Sean also has a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan and worked in a bank for a few years before switching careers. Sean primarily writes markets and policy stories about the grain industry and has attended more than 100 conferences over the past three decades. He has received awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Federation, North American Agricultural Journalists and the American Agricultural Editors Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications