CFIA report to weigh in on glyphosate debate

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency is about to release a report that could change the public perception of glyphosate.

Since 2015, CFIA scientists have been testing food for residues of glyphosate, a product best known by the Roundup brand name, although other brands and generic exist. It is the most popular herbicide in the world.

In 2016, the CFIA said it was planning to test a long list of foods and commodities, including juices, grains, grain products, beans, peas, lentils, soybean products and barley.

Before these tests, the CFIA had not monitored food for residues of the herbicide.

In an email, the agency said it would release an executive summary of the report in a food safety testing bulletin in about a month.

“The executive summary will provide context to what that report means for the health and safety of consumers. An email notification will also be sent to subscribers of the CFIA’s Reports on Food Safety Testing.”

The report could generate a great deal of media attention in Canada because glyphosate is one of the most controversial agricultural chemicals in Europe and America.

Last year, the European Union came close to banning it because of a scientific report from the World Health Organization (WHO).


In March of 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a WHO division, concluded that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic” to humans.

The IARC decision rocked the scientific status quo around glyphosate, as previous studies and most toxicologists had concluded that it’s not carcinogenic.

The IARC report spawned countless lawsuits in the U.S., with environmental groups suing companies over glyphosate residues in foods like granola bars and honey.

Related story: Glyphosate residue in honey raises concerns

California may soon require that glyphosate products carry a label saying it’s a cancer threat, because of the IARC ruling.

Environmental groups are waiting on the CFIA report because it could alter the public debate in Canada.

“Naturally, we welcome the Canadian Food Inspection Agency publishing data on glyphosate contamination levels in food. People have a right to know what risks they’re taking when they go food shopping,” said Eoin Dubsky, from SumOfUs, a global group dedicated to curbing the power of corporations.


“Publicly revealing glyphosate contamination levels in food could also help producers and brands think over their relationship to glyphosate and hopefully we’ll hear smarter food industry players committing to cut the toxic stuff and regain consumer trust.”

The CFIA report comes at a time when IARC and the credibility of its study are under attack.

The European Food Safety Authority, the United Nations World Health Organization, Health Canada, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have studied the risk and said the herbicide doesn’t cause cancer.

In mid-March, the European Chemicals Agency, said direct contact can cause eye damage and chronic exposure poses a risk to aquatic life but it said glyphosate isn’t carcinogenic to humans.

“The available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria… to classify glyphosate for specific target organ toxicity, or as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or for reproductive toxicity.”



  • Walter

    I believe the CFIA has lost a lot of peoples trust, hopefully they are able to regain some of it back.

  • Tony Mitra is compiling and making the data publicly available online with simple charts that shows shocking levels of glyphosate in Canada foods based on govt. records. Canada has some of the HIGHEST levels of glyphosate in the world. Lets hope this “official” release get us some protection and one day “conventional” foods will be digestible again. 😀
    I don’t think I can post links here.
    Search “Tony Mitra Glyphosate” to see the data.

  • Monsanto has its behind covered on this. U.S. Congress passed legislation banning anyone the right to sue Monsanto for anything more than the replacement of or the price paid for seed. Now we see peer reviewed scientific evidence not paid for by the accused showing the effects of glysophate are the same among humans as those in the plant world. Glysophate prohibits the uptake of minerals and metals starving the plant. As a chelater of metals it does the same in humans. Every farmer signed on to the TUG agreement simply by opening a bag of seed. Deep in the 2017 Spring Canola agreement under, “Grower’s Exclusive Limited Remedy” you will find this: . “IN NO EVENT SHALL FGI OR ANY SELLER BE LIABLE FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES.” So…it was the farmer who put the glysophate on the plants and it will be the farmer as the sole defendant in the upcoming class-action that will stun the world at large. Good luck boyz. file:///C:/Users/me/Downloads/Monsanto%20TUG%20agreement.pdf

  • anthony samsel

    Tony Mitra has released the Canadian data available NOW on Amazon in a Kindle download. Title Poison Food of North America. It has the results of 7,800 analysis for glyphosate found in all kinds of food …… a good reference of the current Canadian effort extracted from their raw data….

  • anthony samsel

    Tony Mitra has released the Canadian data available NOW on Amazon in a Kindle download. Title Poison Food of North America

  • Stephen Daniels

    Wonder if it’s more carcinogenic than beef?Than sugar?Then butter?Then the air in large cities?Doubt it.Putting it in perspective seems just a hot button issue for some just like some who are obsessed with fluoride in drinking water, people just on a crusade for the sake of it.

    • richard

      ……..or those obsessed with preserving status quo ignorance…. Its all a matter of perspective… mans ceiling is another mans floor.