Ongoing research suggests that recently developed full track skid steer loaders have load and mobility advantages over traditional wheel models.
Track skid steer loaders are not to be confused with wheel skid steer loaders that have optional belt tracks covering the tires. The purpose-built track units can lift and carry heavier loads than wheel skid steers.
They can also offer greater maneuverability and, because of their lower ground pressure, can travel on some surfaces wheel skid steers cannot.
“Skid steer loaders with tracks are relatively new,” says Reed Turner, an engineer with the AgTech Centre in Lethbridge.
Read Also
VIDEO: Green Lightning and Nytro Ag win sustainability innovation award
Nytro Ag Corp and Green Lightning recieved an innovation award at Ag in Motion 2025 for the Green Lightning Nitrogen Machine, which converts atmospheric nitrogen into a plant-usable form.
“Although most major farm equipment manufacturers have added track skid steers to their lineups in recent years, there has not been a full understanding of their benefits and drawbacks. The goal of this research is to fill in those blanks and get them on par with the performance understanding of wheel skid steers.”
The basic hydraulic principles and controls of track skid steers are identical to wheel skid steer loaders. AgTech evaluated track skid steers with various track designs, with and without suspension systems, comparing them to wheel skid steer loaders. They looked at mobility, lift capability and ride quality.
“Because a track allows a much smaller front roller, the front pivot point can be put closer to the bucket, greatly decreasing a load’s forward tipping leverage,” Turner said.
“This makes it possible to safely transport heavier loads. All loaders have the capability to break out far more than they can lift or carry, but track machines can lift and carry more without tipping forward.
“That is an advantage. In theory, the same effect could be achieved by using a smaller front tire moved forward on a wheel skid steer, but that solution is not practical because of tire limitations.”
The track loaders also showed superior mobility and lower ground pressure, thanks to their increased ground contact area. This is an advantage in situations such as landscaping in which the operator wants to minimize damage to the surface.
Maneuverability was also better with the track skid steers. They displayed better flotation through mud, better turning and an exceptional ability to back out of heavy snow or mud.
“With a wheel skid steer, the tires can spin and dig a hole in the ground and the machine may not have the mobility to climb up out of that hole, particularly while carrying a load,” Turner said.
“With tracks, the skid steers don’t create a hole.”
Although durability was not part of the performance criteria, Turner said there is a potential for savings in track skid steers.
“With rubber tires, every time the operator skids the machine around a turn, rubber is wiped off the tire. Track machines have more area to spread the load over and, in theory, should slide less rubber off as they turn.”
Overall ride quality yielded mixed results. The track skid steers generally offered a smoother ride on flat surfaces, but the lack of an air cushion made for a jolting ride on rough and bumpy surfaces.
Full track suspension systems reduced the jarring effects on the machine, and seat suspensions reduced the effect on the operator, but even then the comfort level did not equal that of wheel skid steers.
“A tire cushions the impact so the operator doesn’t feel every little bump. With tracks there is a direct connection to the ground. It’s a drawback manufacturers are addressing.”
Cost is perhaps the biggest drawback of track skid steers.
“The track and undercarriage components add significantly to the cost of the machines,” Turner said.
“Buying one is a matter of evaluating the best tool for the job.”
