Costs of bovine respiratory disease – Animal Health

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 7, 2002

The average return on feedlot cattle between 1980 and 1999 was 45 cents

US per head.

Cow-calf producers didn’t fare any better. Over the last 25 years, they

have lost an average of $8.41 per cow each year.

Feedlot operators need to focus on cost control while cow-calf

producers need to concentrate on obtaining the best price possible for

calves. Preconditioning programs for calves could meet the needs of

both sectors.

Though market prices have the greatest impact on profitability, disease

Read Also

Looking down a fence line with a blooming yellow canola crop on the right side of the fence, a ditch and tree on the left, with five old metal and wooden granaries in the background.

Producers face the reality of shifting grain price expectations

Significant price shifts have occurred in various grains as compared to what was expected at the beginning of the calendar year. Crop insurance prices can be used as a base for the changes.

costs are a close second. Sick cattle have higher production costs and

poorer feedlot performance than healthy cattle, a difference as high as

$150 per head.

For example, bovine respiratory disease, or BRD, is responsible for

approximately 75 percent of calf illnesses. It can strike up to 70

percent of cattle, but most feedlots report death rates of 15 to 45

percent. Death rates and treatment costs from BRD account for about

eight percent of total production costs.

The true cost of BRD is much higher because infected cattle, even those

with subclinical disease, will have reduced performance.

In one trial, 35 percent of steers were treated for BRD, yet 72

percent had lung lesions at slaughter. Steers without lung

lesions returned on average $30 more per head.

Calf buyers should try to identify calves that are less likely to

succumb to BRD. One way to assess this is to determine whether the calf

consumed colostrum. Calves that don’t get adequate colostrum are three

times more likely to develop BRD.

Collecting this information is difficult unless cow-calf producers

monitor every calf in their herds. A simpler way to improve a calf’s

immunity is through pre-weaning vaccinations against BRD. Besides lower

medical costs, vaccinated calves have a higher average daily gain and

lower cost of gain.

These vaccines should be given at least two weeks before weaning to be

effective. Vaccinations given at weaning do not appear to have the same

positive effects.

Approximately 25 percent of cow-calf operations vaccinate their calves

before weaning. About half use modified live vaccines, which provide

good immunity with just one dose.

The other 50 percent use killed vaccines. Unfortunately, more than two

thirds of these producers fail to boost the killed vaccines properly,

negating their effectiveness.

Buyers for feedlots can only assume that one in six calves are properly

vaccinated for BRD. Providing a buyer with detailed vaccination

information could mean a premium price for a cow-calf producer because

he is no longer selling “average” cattle.

Preconditioning is a step above a pre-weaning vaccination program.

Calves must be weaned at least three weeks before sale so they can be

trained to eat from feed bunks. The calves are also dewormed,

vaccinated, dehorned, and castrated.

Despite the obvious benefits, preconditioning programs have not been

widely adopted. Less than two percent of calves entering American

feedlots are preconditioned.

Cow-calf producers, faced with lower calf prices, are reluctant to

endure the added costs of preconditioning.

Early studies did not consistently demonstrate added calf health and

performance benefits to feedlot buyers so they have been reluctant to

pay premiums on preconditioned cattle.

More current research suggests that preconditioning is beneficial.

Costs for raising preconditioned calves are 12 percent lower than those

for feeding out calves of unknown origin.

Preconditioned cattle also have a better carcass. These recent findings

may spark renewed interest in preconditioning programs.

Jeff Grognet is a veterinarian and writer practicing in Qualicum Beach,

B.C.

explore

Stories from our other publications