Sitting at the head of a massive, shiny board table in a major law firm’s plush conference room and facing about a dozen microphones and reporters, Gordon Wallace could be forgiven for feeling a little nervous.
“I’m not sure what I’m getting myself into,” the grain farmer from Unity, Sask., said with a bit a smile.
Wallace and his legal team had just announced a lawsuit against the two national railways, the federal government and the Canadian Transportation Agency, alleging farmers have been overcharged for rail freight for at least two decades.
Read Also
Ag in Motion speaker highlights need for biosecurity on cattle operations
Ag in Motion highlights need for biosecurity on cattle farms. Government of Saskatchewan provides checklist on what you can do to make your cattle operation more biosecure.
The lawsuit, which lawyers hope to have certified as a class action suit, seeks restitution from the railways.
If the suit is successful, it could potentially involve a repayment to farmers of well over $1 billion.
Wallace, who farms 42 quarter-sections with his two brothers in west-central Saskatchewan, said he has always followed transportation issues with interest, but had never thought about getting involved in the issue.
“I like to complain,” he said.
“This time I decided to do something about it.”
What finally prompted him to take action was the news that in 2007-08, the railways were paid $70 million more to cover the costs of maintaining grain hopper cars than they actually spent.
That works out to $2.60 per tonne.
Wallace said it’s frustrating that even though rail transportation is so important for grain farmers’ business and represents such a significant cost, producers have virtually no influence in setting rates.
“We are a captive customer and have no say in the regulation or determination of these freight rates,” he said.
“Decisions get made at a higher level that pertain to our business and at the grassroots level, we never see it.”
He added the lawsuit will be a tremendous learning experience for him, which is part of the attraction of proceeding.
Wallace described himself as a catalyst for a class action suit, adding the case will be abandoned if the courts reject the application to make it a class action.
He expects wide support from farmers for the suit.
“I can’t see why farmers wouldn’t want to get involved to try to recoup their losses,” he said.
“It’s a no-lose situation. The money’s already gone and anything we can do to lower our freight rates is a benefit.”
Under Saskatchewan law, all grain farmers in Western Canada would automatically be included in the case if the courts certify it as a class action suit.
Those not interested would have to indicate their desire to drop out.
