Support Kyoto, farmers told

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: August 15, 2002

WINDSOR, Ont. – Canada’s farmers should be more vocal in demanding that

the federal government sign the Kyoto treaty on climate change, an

environmental activist told a meeting of farm leaders Aug. 2.

Peter Tabuns of Toronto, representing Greenpeace Canada, told the

summer meeting of Canadian Federation of Agriculture directors that

parts of Canadian agriculture will suffer if average temperatures

continue to rise.

In addition to less stable weather, he said studies suggest prairie

droughts will be 13 times more likely and crop production in the region

Read Also

thumb emoji

Supreme Court gives thumbs-up emoji case the thumbs down

Saskatchewan farmer wanted to appeal the court decision that a thumbs-up emoji served as a signature to a grain delivery contract.

could fall by as much as 30 percent if average temperatures rise 2.5

degrees or more.

“Your organization should demand that the government ratify Kyoto,”

Tabuns said. “It has its weaknesses but it is far more effective than

anything else on the table.”

He said farmers should be lobbying for federal financial support to

fund investments in flood control, irrigation systems and other

projects aimed at reducing the effects of global warming.

They should also be warning governments that future weather patterns

will put pressure on programs such as crop insurance and disaster

relief.

Producers must press governments for a promise that farmers will be

compensated for the negative effects of future climate change, he added.

“If farmers are driven off the farm as a result of drought, they should

be compensated.”

Tabuns said the effects of climate change will be the most harmful on

the Prairies. Consequences will be less severe in Central and Eastern

Canada.

Ironically, agricultural production would increase in the initial

stages of a global warming trend, he said. A one-degree increase in

average temperatures would extend the growing season and increase

agricultural productivity in temperate zones.

However, by the time the warming trend escalates to 2.5 degrees “you

start to see the loss of the benefits you have gained from the early

stages.”

Tabuns joined World Wildlife Fund Canada consultant Rod MacRae on an

environmental panel during the CFA meeting.

Both argued that farmers and environmentalists have much in common and

are increasingly working together on issues such as environmental

stewardship, tillage practices and reduced pesticide use.

When asked whether genetic modification could be used to offset the

effects of climate change, Tabuns downplayed the advantages of genetic

engineering.

Genetic modification could be used to develop plant varieties more

resistant to heat and drought but there are other ways to create

varieties with such characteristics, he argued.

explore

Stories from our other publications