Study says Alta. laws friendlier to industry

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 7, 2002

Alberta’s new environmental rules are more industry friendly than

proposed regulations in Ontario and will give Alberta cattle producers

at least a short-term advantage over Ontario competitors, says a study

produced by the George Morris Centre in Guelph, Ont.

“I definitely think Alberta’s new rules are aimed at giving the

industry more predictable rules for expansion while in Ontario, they

are more aimed at constricting growth,” said George Morris researcher

Holly Mayer of Calgary, one of the report’s authors.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

“It is possible that Ontario farmers wanting to expand might see the

opportunities better in the West.”

In both provinces, new environmental rules will add costs to new or

expanding intensive livestock operations. In Ontario, existing

operations also must adhere to proposed new rules.

Alberta’s law and regulations took effect in early 2002, while

Ontario’s proposals remain before the legislature, to be passed

sometime this year.

They are aimed at responding to public concerns about water, soil and

air contamination from expanding or intensive livestock operations.

In Ontario, where manure-contaminated water killed seven people and

made hundreds more sick in Walkerton, the proposed legislation will

impose tough standards for manure storage, handling and transportation,

strengthen manure application regulations and regulate farms according

to their size and potential for pollution.

In Alberta, the emphasis is on helping potential investors know what

they must do to win approval to establish a new farm or expand an

existing one. Current operations are not affected unless they expand.

“Overall, the new legislation should facilitate growth in the hog

industry in particular,” said the report.

“It is anticipated that plans for the construction of hog production

facilities, which have been put on hold due to uncertainty in gaining

regulatory approval, will now move ahead.”

The report said expansion will end up being cheaper in Alberta than in

Ontario.

The analysis of environmental legislation in the two provinces suggests

it will make life more predictable for livestock investors and reduce

public concerns about manure-related pollution.

But it also suggests that an unintended side effect could be a

concentration of the industry and expansion of existing operations.

Smaller livestock farms may decide they cannot afford the cost of new

environmental controls.

“The irony is that if the regulations significantly increase capital

costs, it may be necessary for farmers to expand output to generate

sufficient revenue to recover the additional costs,” the report said.

And particularly in Ontario, where the new rules apply to all

producers, it could drive existing small producers out of the business.

“The proposed Ontario legislation could result in fewer and larger

livestock operations.”

explore

Stories from our other publications