OTTAWA (Reuters) — Three Canadian National Railway derailments in the same area in three weeks, two of them involving oil trains, cannot be explained away as a fluke of nature, Canada’s transport minister said, adding she is satisfied for now with steps CN has taken to prevent another accident.
CN oil trains came off the tracks and caught fire near the small northern Ontario town of Gogama on Feb. 14 and March 7. A third train hauling empty cars derailed in the same area March 5.
“I’m concerned about it … three in a row is significant,” transport minister Lisa Raitt said in an interview. “There must be reasons behind it. It cannot just be a fluke of nature.”
Read Also
Interest in biological crop inputs continues to grow
It was only a few years ago that interest in alternative methods such as biologicals to boost a crop’s nutrient…
An initial Transportation Safety Board of Canada probe said track faults could be responsible for all three accidents.
Raitt said the transport ministry, which regulates railways in Canada, has inspected “every single inch of that rail” along the 485 kilometre stretch in question and is analyzing the data.
“They are going to make sure that if they find anything that they will utilize the tools they have, which includes prosecution under the Railway Safety Act,” she said.
In response to the accidents, CN has reduced the speed of trains in the area and boosted its own inspections. Raitt said she was satisfied with the railway’s response “for now.”
Raitt also said her officials would consult academic experts about the risk assessments that CN Rail has done on its tracks “to say, ‘Are we missing something here?’ “
The rapid rise in the transport of crude oil by rail in recent years has increased concerns about the chances of a disaster. A runaway oil train levelled the centre of the Quebec town of Lac-Megantic in July 2013, killing 47 people.
Federal legislators who grilled CN executives at a parliamentary committee meeting March 24 suggested crude oil trains would be safer if they ran with fewer cars.
Raitt said her officials were looking at train lengths as part of their investigation, but expressed little obvious enthusiasm for the idea.
“If we shorten the trains, then you’re going to have more locomotives going and … more trains and more traffic in Canada and what does that mean?” she said.
In the wake of Lac-Megantic, Canada and the United States both ordered tanker cars be strengthened and are now working together on standards for a new generation of tougher cars.
Canada issued its proposals on March 11 and Raitt said she was confident the two countries would agree on the specifications for a single model.
