Soil testing especially crucial in organics

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: October 24, 2002

Most farmers are familiar with the notion of soil testing. It’s the

creed for most agricultural extension workers.

But surprisingly, many producers, including organic farmers, do not

regularly test their soil.

There are several explanations.

A few farmers do not see the potential economic benefit, and therefore

view soil testing as an additional expense. Many find it hard to

interpret soil test lab reports, while many organic producers find

conventional soil test lab reports frustrating because they are not

Read Also

Jared Epp stands near a small flock of sheep and explains how he works with his stock dogs as his border collie, Dot, waits for command.

Stock dogs show off herding skills at Ag in Motion

Stock dogs draw a crowd at Ag in Motion. Border collies and other herding breeds are well known for the work they do on the farm.

practical for their production systems.

Similarly, many long-term organic producers find conventional soil

tests to be a superficial assessment of soil health and a poor

indicator of crop production potential.

The current draft of the National Organic Standards requires soil

testing every three years. A link to the National Organic Standards

can be found at www.producer.com under news links.

Soil testing is mandatory for some organic certifying bodies, while

others require it less frequently, such as when first applying for

certification.

  • What is needed to take a soil test?

Typical equipment includes a soil probe or shovel, a bucket preferably

made of plastic or non-galvanized metal, boxes or bags that are often

provided by soil test labs, and a waterproof marker for labeling.

Ziploc bags are suitable if boxes aren’t available.

  • How many samples are enough?

Composite samples of several individual probes within an area are a

good way to obtain representative samples. Collect cores from 15 to 20

random spots for every 20 acres. Avoid sampling near roads, fence rows

and highly eroded areas. Do not include soil from high-yielding and

low-yielding areas in the same composite sample, because

recommendations for these areas would vary. This may seem tedious, but

remember that a one kilogram sample represents more than 20 million kg

of soil.

Sampling depth is linked to field management. If only the top five

centimetres of the field are to be worked or the field is pasture, then

a 10 cm depth is adequate.

For soil that is worked or tilled, the depth would be about 15 cm. Soil

will generally have less fertility the deeper you go. Samples taken too

deep may make it appear the land is less fertile than it is.

  • When and how often do you take samples?

A soil sample every three or four years may be sufficient to provide

general indication of fertility, but will not provide detailed analysis

for specific management decisions.

More frequent soil testing is needed to monitor soil improvement of a

particular area or produce a high quality product.

Frequency of sampling also depends on soil type, crop rotation and

climatic factors. Sandier soil has greater fluctuations in nutrient

levels and requires more frequent tests, as do crops such as silage

corn and alfalfa that remove a lot of potassium, and irrigated crops.

Also, droughty soil requires frequent soil testing because of the

variability in the uptake of available nitrogen.

Soil can be tested at any time, but is done primarily after harvest.

Organic producers often alter their crop rotation or choose to include

green manure and underseeded crops in response to soil tests.

  • How do you interpret results?

The standard soil test provides data on soil nutrient levels including

nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, and a few soil

chemical characteristics such as soil organic matter, pH, base

saturation and cation exchange capacity. Cation exchange capacity is

related to the soil’s ability to store minerals.

These parameters form the basis of fertilizer and liming

recommendations for a subsequent crop. However, translating the results

into useful organic fertilizer recommendations is not easy. The United

States has several private labs and a few public ones that issue

organic recommendations or formulas to help convert conventional

recommendations into organic management.

The Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture and Forestry has

started a program to help organic producers develop a nutrient

management plan based on fertility recommendations using only certified

organic amendments.

Many organic farmers view standard soil tests as “treating-the-symptom”

management, and desire better evaluation tools to help assess whether

their practices are leading to a healthy soil system.

Increased awareness of the importance of measuring non-chemical

parameters has led to several on-farm test kits and testing equipment.

In the U.S., kits are available that can assess soil respiration,

infiltration, bulk density electrical conductivity, soil pH, soil

nitrate, aggregate stability, soil slaking, earthworm activity, topsoil

depth, compaction, root development, water salinity and nitrate-nitrite

levels in water.

The diversity of these parameters shows that crop productivity is not

the only factor affected by soil health. The soil’s ability to resist

erosion, buffer pollutants and cycle nutrients is also important.

Increasing farmer knowledge about parameters such as biological

activity and soil structure may lead to more innovative farming

practices that promote a well-balanced soil system.

The writer, Av Singh, is the extension co-ordinator at Agriculture

Canada’s Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada. He can be contacted at

902-893-6275 or by e-mail at asingh@nsac.ns.ca

About the author

Agriculture Canada

News release

explore

Stories from our other publications