Quebec co-ops study West to avoid erosion of grassroots

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: February 14, 2002

When Quebec farmers look west, they are confused.

They see that the once proud prairie grain co-operatives that defined

western agriculture have disintegrated and they don’t understand why.

Meanwhile, in Quebec, the Co-opérative fédérée de Quebec, an umbrella

group for Quebec co-operatives, is alive and well.

The $3.7 billion organization has 37,000 members and is responsible for

more than 14,000 agriculture jobs in the province.

In the past five years, the federation paid more than $51 million in

Read Also

Spencer Harris (green shirt) speaks with attendees at the Nutrien Ag Solutions crop plots at Ag in Motion on July 16, 2025. Photo: Greg Berg

Interest in biological crop inputs continues to grow

It was only a few years ago that interest in alternative methods such as biologicals to boost a crop’s nutrient…

dividends to its farmer members. In the past 10 years, it directed more

than $685 million into new investments.

Yet, there is concern that what has happened in Western Canada could

occur in Quebec.

To prevent a similar erosion of traditional-style co-operatives in

Quebec, the fédérée hired Quebec reporter Nicolas Mesly to travel

Western Canada and interview farmers and industry specialists to try

and understand what happened to the grain co-operatives Agricore and

Saskatchewan Wheat Pool and the dairy co-op Dairyworld.

“There is a lot of worry in the co-ops about what happened in the

West,” Mesly told a group of farmers gathered to share their thoughts

on the demise of the grain co-operatives.

“Maybe one day the same choice might happen down there,” said Mesly in

halting English.

While Federated Co-op’s network of retail businesses remains an example

of a successful traditional co-op, western grain companies have been

forced to make radical changes in the past 10 years. The company

leaders generally cite intense competition from international

conglomerates as the factor driving the changes.

Sask Pool is now traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange but maintains its

tradition of farmer control by allowing only farmer shareholders to

vote.

Agricore, which was formed out of the merger of two smaller co-ops –

Manitoba Pool Elevators and Alberta Wheat Pool – has merged with United

Grain Growers to become Agricore United and operates as a standard

publicly traded company.

“Things are going well now, but the question asked is why some co-ops

are in big difficulty. What has led to those problems to avoid them,”

said Mesly.

It’s a question that frustrates the group of farmers around a boardroom

table at Augustana University in Camrose, Alta., who could see grain

co-ops eroding like topsoil in a rainstorm, but were helpless to stop

it. The group had a long history of involvement in prairie co-ops. Some

had grandparents who were original members of Alberta Wheat Pool and

United Grain Growers.

Co-op membership brings a sense of alienation rather than pride, said

Kevin Loveseth of Viking, Alta., whose family has supported co-ops for

three generations.

He said delegates’ opinions were ignored when they pointed to

Agricore’s escalating debt.

“They kept building and building and putting us deeper and deeper in

debt,” said Loveseth, who was told by different Agricore managers not

to worry about the debt. He was even chastised by other delegates for

challenging management decisions, Loveseth said.

Less than two years later, debt forced the merger with United Grain

Growers.

Horst Schreiber of Strome echoed Loveseth’s concerns: “The delegates

were worried about the debt but we were told we worry too much.”

It no longer seemed the company’s direction came from the farmer

delegates. Changes were orchestrated from above, they told Mesly.

“No matter what we said, it wasn’t listened to anymore,” said

Schreiber, who resigned when his local wooden elevator was closed.

“I said ‘I’m not going to be part of this farce of democracy.’ “

Grassroots support and direction from members are key to a traditional

co-operative. Local producers elect delegates, who elect directors to

the board, who hire the senior management to run the company with the

board’s guidance. Vital to it all is member support and input into

decisions.

In a written submission to Mesly, Bill Dobson of Paradise Valley,

Alta., said delegates must take some responsibility for the company’s

demise by demanding so much from the organization.

“Everyone has a goal to increase market share and enjoy double-digit

growth. These are expectations that are difficult to achieve, if not

impossible, on an on-going basis. Unfortunately, all too often, nobody

wants to ‘put on the brakes’ for fear of being thought an old-fashioned

stick in the mud.”

Harvey Thomas of Alliance, Alta., said years ago the time spent at the

two-week Alberta Wheat Pool annual meeting in Calgary cemented

delegates’ belief in the co-op. Farmers realized the benefits of

co-operatives.

Over the years meetings shrank to two or three days to rubber stamp

previously made board decisions, reinforcing the belief that local

delegates don’t count.

Jean Heie, a Kingman farmer, said some pool policies alienated more

progressive farmers. Her husband was thrilled to be asked to become a

member, but when he discovered he had to buy and sell all his farm

produce through the pool, he didn’t fit the criteria.

“You aren’t going to attract the most progressive farmers because you

weren’t allowed to market to anyone else. That really limits you,” said

Heie, a pedigreed seed producer.

Adam Campbell said one of the reasons he emigrated from Scotland to the

Prairies was because of the co-operative grain system. When times were

good, those running the co-operatives thought the goal was to become a

big grain player instead of listening to farmers.

“The board of directors and management were seduced. They thought they

were like ADM (Archer Daniels Midland). They forgot they were a

co-operative.”

explore

Stories from our other publications