Ontario irked at Vanclief’s approach

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 28, 2002

Ontario has moved from being an enthusiastic supporter of the federal

agricultural policy framework and a key summertime ally of Ottawa to

being an autumn APF skeptic and a critic of the federal performance.

Ontario agriculture minister Helen Johns will go to a Dec. 4

federal-provincial meeting on safety nets wondering what game Ottawa

has been playing and why so little progress has been made in designing

new farm safety net programs since the APF was signed in June in

Read Also

thumb emoji

Supreme Court gives thumbs-up emoji case the thumbs down

Saskatchewan farmer wanted to appeal the court decision that a thumbs-up emoji served as a signature to a grain delivery contract.

Halifax.

At the time, Johns was the first provincial minister to pledge a 40

percent share of Ontario’s portion of the federal $600 million

transition fund.

Now, she sounds disappointed and a bit betrayed.

“It is embarrassing for all of us that we’ve made so little progress in

five or six months,” she said in an interview from her Toronto office.

Johns will be going to the meeting to support farm groups in their plea

that existing safety net programs be extended for a year past March 31,

2003, to avoid new programs that aren’t guaranteed to be better than

existing ones.

“To rush and to put a program in place that could risk the livelihood

of the agriculture community in the province and in Canada is a crying

shame,” she said.

Federal agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief has said he will not agree

to a program extension. He is convinced a new program design can be in

place by next spring and that consultations with farmers and provinces

are producing results.

Johns has a different version of events since Halifax in June.

She recites a litany of complaints that includes lack of sincere

communication from Ottawa, a dollop of federal arrogance, a refusal to

provide details and some promise betrayal by Vanclief.

There were, for instance, the two letters to Ottawa from Johns and

Manitoba agriculture minister Rosann Wowchuk asking for meetings with

Vanclief on APF safety net issues. Neither letter was answered.

Suddenly, Ottawa called a federal-provincial meeting for Dec. 4.

“I think not having two ministers’ letters answered is problematic,”

she said.

Then there is the issue of farm groups that asked for details about how

programs might be changed but received no federal details or analysis

to prove that better alternatives exist to what is now available.

“I think not to have good consultation with farm groups is a problem.”

She also said it was arrogant of Ottawa to distribute its $600 million

in 2002 transition funds through the Net Income Stabilization Account

program, over the objections of farmers and provinces.

But Johns’ most serious complaint is that in Halifax, Vanclief promised

her national APF standards and equitable treatment for all provinces.

Since then, Ottawa has been holding bilateral negotiations with each of

the seven provinces that have signed, offering some better deals than

others. In one case, Quebec was offered a deal even though it has not

signed, Johns said.

“The federal minister promised me there could be companion programs in

the province, but we would have to look at how to make those programs

work,” she said.

“All of a sudden, we’re told no companion programs in Ontario, but

Quebec gets to keep its companion program. That is not acceptable.

There has to be equity.”

She said there is no way a new set of programs can be in place for the

next fiscal year if Ottawa continues to act as it has. And a set of

programs imposed by Ottawa on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, as many

provinces fear, would not be acceptable.

Johns, who is a Progressive Conservative, said she is hoping the

federal Liberal rural caucus will convince Vanclief and his senior

bureaucrats to be more flexible.

explore

Stories from our other publications