Ontario fears U.S. farm bill, too

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: July 4, 2002

HALIFAX, N.S. – While prairie farmers and their politicians often

portray the region as the main potential victim of the United States

farm bill, Ontario agriculture minister Helen Johns has a distinctly

different view.

“We believe the farm bill has a large impact in Ontario,” she said.

Ontario’s corn, soybean, wheat and special crops producers all face the

prospect of lower returns because of American subsidies, she said.

While American subsidies are available to give U.S. producers a profit

Read Also

thumb emoji

Supreme Court gives thumbs-up emoji case the thumbs down

Saskatchewan farmer wanted to appeal the court decision that a thumbs-up emoji served as a signature to a grain delivery contract.

once they have captured their production costs from the market, Ontario

farmers are largely stuck with market returns.

“So Ontario farmers will be affected by trade injury as well,” said

Johns, appointed minister last winter.

She will be lobbying Ottawa to make sure Ontario receives its fair

share of the $600 million in transition funding due to be distributed

this year and again next year, to be sent largely to sectors and areas

with greatest needs. Ontario has promised to put up 40 percent to

Ottawa’s 60 percent.

Ontario argues that in addition to U.S. subsidy impacts, the province’s

fruit and vegetable industry has been hurt by drought.

But the longer-term and bigger threat to Ontario from the farm bill is

the provision that will impose mandatory country-of-origin labels on

imports beginning in 2004.

Johns said it could lead many of Ontario’s food processing and

manufacturing plants to move south, since the American market is their

main livelihood.

“We have a very large food industry in the province and the food

industry is very concerned,” she said. “They are worried about slippage

in the export market.”

And provincial officials are worried about investment flight south of

the border, with thousands of jobs at stake.

It has led the Ontario minister to demand that the federal government

take a more aggressive stand against the U.S. farm bill, and involve

the affected provinces more in developing strategy for a World Trade

Organization challenge.

“I am pushing for more involvement by the provinces because I think we

need a more aggressive stance,” said Johns. “I go so far as to say

maybe we shouldn’t be sending out our water and national resources if

we can’t do more for the agricultural community.”

Meanwhile, trade issues dominated discussions during the last few hours

of the federal-provincial agriculture ministers’ summer meeting June

27-28. In answer to provincial demands for a tougher stand by Ottawa,

federal minister Lyle Vanclief emerged to say he hopes mandatory

labelling never takes effect.

The bill approved by the U.S. government last spring establishes two

years of voluntary country-of-origin labelling before mandatory rules

kick in.

“In the farm bill, it is voluntary and they are getting under a lot of

pressure from all around the world,” said Vanclief.

explore

Stories from our other publications