Oil company says law ‘favors the farmer’

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: February 29, 1996

CADOGAN, Alta. (Staff) – The dispute between an oil company and an eastern Alberta ranch has turned into a “cat and mouse” game, says an oil company representative.

Victor Almond said the decision of who pays in a damage dispute is up to an arbitrator.

“Right now we’re saying ‘no, we’re not going to pay’, ” said Almond, construction, reclamation and environment supervisor with Inverness Oil and Gas, the company fighting with the Todd Ranch of Hughenden.

Owners of the Todd Ranch say Inverness has breached its contract by not paying its annual lease fee before it was given a reclamation certificate by the province’s environment department for an oil well site on ranch land.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

Almond said his company feels the land has been returned to its original value and so it doesn’t think the ranch should get a full lease payment.

He blamed politics for stopping the department of environment from issuing a reclamation certificate.

Changes wanted

Almond said the problem lies in the legislation. Many oil companies want the legislation changed to allow the Surface Rights Board to reduce the rent oil companies must pay to farmers while awaiting a reclamation certificate.

“Right now it all falls in favor of the farmer,” said Almond.

While Inverness refused to pay the lease fees, Rigel Oil and Gas Ltd., the company that recently took over Inverness, may take a different position, he said.

explore

Stories from our other publications