MPs find little sympathy for U.S. farm bill fallout

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 30, 2002

They said it in different ways, and with varying degrees of

sheepishness, but American politicians meeting with Canadian

parliamentarians recently passed along a common message: the U.S. farm

bill and its subsidies are here to stay for awhile.

Don’t waste time complaining about it, Canada. Learn how to live with

it.

“They didn’t really try very hard to defend their position because it

is indefensible,” said Canadian Alliance MP Monte Solberg.

“One senator said it was bad policy but he didn’t have the guts to vote

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

against it.”

Prince Edward Island Liberal Wayne Easter said the American message was

clear: “We’re going to stand with our farmers and we’re sorry if that

hurts Canadian farmers but that’s the way it is.”

The two MPs were part of a Canadian delegation of MPs and senators who

travelled to Rhode Island for an annual meeting with American members

of congress and senators May 17-20.

Issues raised traditionally cover the gambit of U.S.-Canadian relations

but this year, trade irritants and the farm bill held centre stage.

Many Canadians left the meetings convinced that the Americans are in no

mood to compromise.

“It was politics, crass domestic politics, and the world be damned,”

said Ontario Liberal Bob Speller.

“I would say some were sheepish but not enough to change right now.

Maybe later.”

He said one argument was that a pending redistribution of congressional

seats means that rural America will lose some clout in the next

congressional elections. The subsidy-heavy farm bill was needed to set

a pattern for future versions when rural political clout is not as

strong.

Lethbridge Alliance MP Rick Casson said he was told some of the farm

bill clauses could be used as American bargaining chips at the next

World Trade Organization negotiations.

“I think once the fall elections are over, they will become a bit more

flexible,” he said. “It’s like over-dressing when you go to a strip

poker game. You have more to take off before you’re naked.”

Easter said the message was that Canadian federal and provincial

governments have to “step up to the plate” to support Canadian farmers

as long as their competitors are supported.

explore

Stories from our other publications