Marketing boards support appeal effort

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: December 10, 1998

Several of Alberta’s marketing boards and commissions have appealed a court decision, now stayed, that makes unconstitutional the act that governs them.

“This has very substantial impact,” said Gary Sargent, general manager of the Alberta Cattle Commission. The organization’s lawyer asked for intervenor status Dec. 7 in the Alberta Court of Appeal.

“There is $15 million of producer funds utilized to support marketing and export marketing decisions for 16 different agencies,” said Sargent.

No cattle producers have so far asked that checkoffs not be deducted from cattle sales despite justice Virgil Moshansky’s ruling that the Marketing of Agriculture Products Act, which governs many of the province’s agriculture organizations, was overreaching.

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

Sargent said it would be “narrow thinking” by producers to ask for their checkoffs back since the money is used to find export markets.

Await decisions

Once an appeal is filed, the decision by Moshansky will be put on hold until the three appeal court judges make their decision.

Many organizations governed by the act use the legislation to collect levies to fund their operations and pay for research and market

development.

Paul Hodgman, manager of public affairs for the Alberta Pork Producers Development Corporation, said his group will be asking for intervenor status in the appeal.

“We’re appealing whether it’s positive or negative,” said Hodgman.

Janette McDonald Adam, general manager of the Alberta Pulse Growers Association, said the board has yet to decide whether it will get involved in the appeal.

“We’re pretty small players. We tend to stay out of these legal wranglings,” she said.

Andy Kovacs, executive director of the Alberta Soft Wheat Producers Commission, said his group doesn’t have money to go to court, and in any case might have little impact on the decision.

explore

Stories from our other publications