India loses dispute over bird flu curbs on U.S. poultry

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: October 23, 2014

GENEVA (Reuters) — India broke World Trade Organization rules by blocking U.S. poultry imports because of unsubstantiated bird flu fears, a WTO dispute panel ruled last week.

India had claimed its import restrictions were justified by international rules on animal health, but the panel agreed with the United States and found that India’s measures were not based on international standards and were discriminatory.

The U.S. brought the case in March 2012, with the American poultry industry confident the case would open a market for exports then conservatively valued at US$300 million.

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

In India, which could appeal against the ruling, the trade ministry declined to comment.

A senior official at the ministry, who declined to be named, said the government would study the ruling and a decision on appeal against the decision could be taken after getting the view of the animal husbandry department.

The ruling could increase imports of poultry products from the United States, although India could still try to restrict them using other measures such as anti-dumping duties if U.S. exporters tried to sell their products at unfairly cheap prices.

Otherwise, India is bound to provide fair market access to other countries under the WTO rules.

In July, India blocked a global trade deal that the WTO hoped would restore its role as a forum for negotiating world trade rules after two decades of inertia, and it has continued to resist U.S. pressure to remove its veto.

explore

Stories from our other publications