Growers use controversial report to get noticed

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: January 11, 1996

WINNIPEG (Staff) – Controversy forces people to take notice.

That’s why sugar beet producers in Manitoba recently decided to release a confidential study they commissioned about a year ago. They want the processor and provincial and federal governments to pay attention to and make decisions on their industry.

Ken Yuill, president of the sugar beet growers’ association, described the report as provocative. The group hired Winnipeg consultant Brian Kelly to study options for marketing beets.

Kelly looked at how growers would benefit if:

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

  • They shipped beets to the American Crystal Sugar Company in North Dakota.
  • American Crystal bought the Winnipeg plant, now owned by Rogers Sugar.
  • Growers bought the plant.
  • They become partners with Rogers and American Crystal in the Winnipeg plant.
  • They work with Alberta growers to buy both Canadian processing plants.
  • They build a new plant in Manitoba.

Kelly also looked at another option, which was blanked out of the report. Yuill said it was so “far-out” that it won’t be made available.

Yuill said scenarios involving the American Crystal plant are now out of the picture since the U.S. put up a tariff wall against sugar beet imports last summer.

But he added that almost anything is up for consideration. “Today is new times and things change. And maybe what wasn’t viable last year or 10 years ago could be.”

In the study, the consultant concluded the two best scenarios would be selling beets to North Dakota, or the deleted option. Yuill said growers have not narrowed down their options, but they want more control.

“This time around, if (growers) don’t have a vested interest in the operation of the processing, they aren’t going to be too interested in continuing production,” Yuill said.

About the author

Roberta Rampton

Western Producer

explore

Stories from our other publications