Gov’t trade strategy doubted: report

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: April 25, 2002

The Liberal task force on agriculture has told the prime minister and

Liberal caucus that many farmers have little faith in the government’s

trade strategy.

Many farmers are suspicious that Canadian marketing boards and state

trading enterprises such as the Canadian Wheat Board could be

undermined in future trade negotiations, in part because of lukewarm

government support, the committee said.

“Canadians have told us they are concerned about the future of their

marketing boards,” said the April 17 report from the task force of

Read Also

A photo of the flag of British Columbia flying in front of the B.C. legislature in Victoria.

British Columbia farmers to receive increased AgriStability supports

B.C. farmers to receive bump in AgriStability compensations due to weather concerns, international trade instability

Liberal MPs and senators that was presented by chair Bob Speller. “It

is felt that there is very little support for them in the federal and

provincial bureaucracies.”

The group demanded a stronger show of commitment.

“The government must instruct its international trade negotiators to

defend our sovereign right to determine our domestic marketing systems,

including export state trading enterprises.”

Meanwhile, at least one task force proposal had the Canadian Alliance

talking about theft.

The report noted that trade disputes involving perishable products “can

result in a loss of value or even the entire shipment.”

It referred to Canada-United States disputes last year that tied up

shipments of hothouse tomatoes and Prince Edward Island potatoes.

“A Canadian rapid response team should be established to prevent delays

and to deal swiftly with trade disputes over perishable goods,”

recommended the Liberal report.

Alliance trade critic Rick Casson said it sounds suspiciously like a

steal from an earlier CA call for establishment of a non-binding “rapid

response process” to try to head off costly trade disputes with the U.S.

“It is good to see that at least some Liberals see the need for our

rapid response proposal,” said Casson. “Now, if only their cabinet

would wake up and adopt the policy.”

Actually, the Liberal task force recommendation appears to stop short

of the Alliance suggestion for the creation of a panel of experts to

hear arguments from both sides before a trade dispute ends up in a long

formal trade dispute resolution process.

Agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief has already raised doubts about the

proposal. In a letter last year to Casson, he questioned whether

another informal trade dispute panel process could simply delay the

ultimate resolution by adding another layer.

explore

Stories from our other publications