LONDON, U.K. (Reuters) — Glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in people, according to a new safety review by United Nations health, agriculture and food experts.
In a statement likely to intensify a row over its potential health impact, experts from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization said glyphosate is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans” who are exposed to it through food.
Having reviewed the scientific evidence, the joint WHO-FAO committee also said glyphosate is unlikely to be genotoxic in humans. In other words, it is not likely to have a destructive effect on cells’ genetic material.
Read Also
Man charged after assault at grain elevator
RCMP have charged a 51-year-old Weyburn man after an altercation at the Pioneer elevator at Corinne, Sask. July 22.
Diazinon and malathion, two other pesticides reviewed by the committee, were also found to be unlikely to be carcinogenic.
“In view of the absence of carcinogenic potential in rodents at human-relevant doses and the absence of genotoxicity by the oral route in mammals, and considering the epidemiological evidence from occupational exposures, the meeting concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet,” the committee said.
Glyphosate is also “unlikely to be genotoxic at anticipated dietary exposures,” it added.
The group reaffirmed an acceptable daily intake of up to one milligram of glyphosate for every kilogram of body weight.
The conclusions appear to contradict a finding by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which in March 2015 said glyphosate “probably” causes cancer in humans and classified it as a Group 2A carcinogen.
Seven months after the IARC review, the European Food Safety Authority, an independent agency funded by the European Union, published a different assessment, saying glyphosate is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans.”
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which first assessed glyphosate in 1986 and has reviewed it several times since then, had also previously concluded it has “low toxicity for humans.”
The EPA is being investigated for withdrawing a report saying the chemical is probably not carcinogenic.
In a question-and-answer document issued alongside the joint FAO/WHO statement, the WHO denied that the conclusions by the joint group and IARC were contradictory. It said they were “different, yet complementary.
“IARC reviews published studies to identify potential cancer hazards,” the WHO said.
“It does not estimate the level of risk to the population associated with exposure to the hazard.”
In contrast, it said, the joint FAO-WHO committee looks at published and unpublished studies to assess the health risk to consumers from dietary exposure to pesticide residues in food.
