Fusarium can’t survive in rumen

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: May 2, 2002

A three-year study by federal researchers found the cattle rumen is not

a friendly place for fusarium, a fungal disease of cereal crops that

has become a menace to agriculture.

The study, started in 1999, found no evidence that the disease remains

viable after passing through the digestive system of cattle in

feedlots, said Kelly Turkington, plant pathologist at Agriculture

Canada’s Lacombe Research Centre.

“If it’s put through the animal, it looks like that will take care of a

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

large part of the risk.”

The finding was based on samples of manure collected from several

feedlots in Manitoba and Alberta.

The research may be important as Alberta, an importer of feed grains,

weighs what new measures it should take to keep out grains that may be

infected with fusarium.

Turkington could not say why fusarium loses viability in the cattle

rumen. Microbes in the rumen, or even the temperature, could be some of

the factors at play.

The research also checked samples of grain in feedbunks and from grain

spills at Alberta and Manitoba feedlots.

While the disease was common in grain samples taken from Manitoba

feedlots, it was not found in the Alberta samples. Samples taken in

2001 are still being tested.

Fusarium graminearum has been declared a pest in Alberta and is the

species that has proved most devastating for cereal crop production in

Manitoba.

Even at low levels, infected grain can produce spores that could spread

the disease to agricultural land.

However, Turkington views grain spilled from feedbunks as a smaller

concern than grain spilled at railroad sidings and along highways.

At the feedlot, the grain can be shoveled back into the bunk. Or, if

the cattle don’t want it, it can be composted with manure. Composted

manure also appears to destroy fusarium.

Meanwhile, grain spilled on the side of a highway could be a source of

infection for at least two years, Turkington said.

“My biggest concern, from a pathology point of view, would be that

grain.”

Jeff Warrack, who operates a large feedlot and grain farm with his

family near Strathmore, Alta., hopes science, rather than emotion, will

be the basis for deciding whether added restrictions are warranted for

feed grains entering his province.

From the perspective of a crop producer, he does not want fusarium to

become entrenched in Alberta.

However, as a feedlot operator he does not want the province to bring

in restrictions that would choke off his supply of feed grains.

“It’s a real concern to the livestock industry here if all of the

sudden those feeds aren’t going to be available to us.”

A crop production pathologist at Agriculture Canada’s Brandon Research

Centre hopes funding will soon be approved for a more controlled study

on fusarium-infected grain fed to cattle.

Debbie McLaren said the study would allow more precise controls of the

levels of fusarium infection in the grains being fed.

McLaren would also like to know what aspects of the cattle’s digestive

system impair the fungus.

Meanwhile, emergency registration has been granted to allow farmers to

use Folicur, a fungicide that suppresses fusarium head blight.

It’s the fourth year Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency

has granted emergency use registration for Folicur in Manitoba,

Saskatchewan, Quebec and Ontario to help farmers fight fusarium in

spring wheat, winter wheat and durum.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications