Feds propose NISA, crop insurance link

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: November 28, 2002

The federal government is proposing a major overhaul of the Net Income

Stabilization Account program that would change the formula that

triggers withdrawals, add a disaster and investment component and offer

matching government contributions only when money is withdrawn.

In a discussion paper on proposed program design under the agricultural

policy framework, Ottawa is suggesting an expanded crop insurance that

would offer “whole farm” insurance packages and varying levels of

government contributions, depending on the type of coverage.

Read Also

Man charged after assault at grain elevator

RCMP have charged a 51-year-old Weyburn man after an altercation at the Pioneer elevator at Corinne, Sask. July 22.

Ottawa is proposing that NISA and production insurance programs be

linked, perhaps by requiring a farmer to take part in both if benefits

are to be taken from either. They would be the only two programs under

the APF.

The federal government plans to phase in the new program over three

years, beginning with transition steps next year. There will be no need

for a massive program overhaul before the 2003 crop year.

At the end of three years, provincial “companion programs” would end.

“In response to the results of extensive consultations with producers,

governments are proposing to keep the best of what currently exists

while addressing the problems identified in the program review,”

Agriculture Canada said as it introduced the discussion paper.

The paper amounts to the most detailed glimpse yet of what Ottawa would

like to do under the APF.

It sets the stage for an expected stormy federal-provincial ministers’

meeting Dec. 4 when discussion centres on program design and whether

there is enough time to create new programs before March 31, 2003 when

the $500 million Canadian Farm Income Program expires.

Many of the federal ideas will be controversial.

Proposals to expand NISA to include disaster and investment funds draw

criticism that the program’s original intent, to stabilize income, is

being undermined. Some provinces, including Quebec, will likely protest

the federal suggestion that provincial companion programs be dropped.

As key components of the proposed program, Ottawa is suggesting:

  • Farmers unable to make contributions one year would be able to carry

forward the contribution room to a future year. The government says it

will help beginning farmers.

  • The allowable contribution level would be calculated as a combination

of eligible net sales and the margin (revenue left after expenses).

Withdrawal triggers could be based on margin declines.

  • NISA calculations would be based on accrual accounting principles

rather than cash accounting. Producers who use cash accounting for

income tax would be able to use a modified accrual accounting system

for NISA purposes.

  • To encourage farmer use of NISA funds, the government’s matching

contribution might be paid only when farmer funds are withdrawn.

Retiring farmers would be able to withdraw only their own contributions

and interest, while government contributions would stay in NISA.

  • Some NISA account funds could be withdrawn “for investments that

could improve the long-term profitability of the farming business.”

The proposed changes to crop insurance include varying government

contributions – from 100 percent for “infrequent catastrophic loss

situation” and wildlife crop damage, to 60 percent for comprehensive

production loss insurance, to 33 percent for high-cost production

losses.

An option would be added to provide crop-specific insurance.

Ottawa also suggests the cash advance program be extended for at least

five more years.

explore

Stories from our other publications