Feds gather carbon sink evidence

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 28, 2002

The federal government has announced a $6 million fund to help develop

evidence that forests and farmland absorb carbon out of the atmosphere

and can help Canada meet its international commitment to reduce

greenhouse gas.

Federal environment officials said Canada’s managed forests and

farmland can contribute a significant part of the nation’s promise to

reduce greenhouse gas emissions to six percent less than 1990 levels.

At recent international negotiations on the Kyoto Accord, Canada was

instrumental in winning recognition for the impact of carbon sinks to

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

offset emissions.

“We expect that these carbon sinks will account for 10 to 15 percent of

the effort needed by Canada to reach our Kyoto target,” environment

minister David Anderson said March 19 as his department announced the

$6 million grant to the Queens University-based Biocap Canada. Another

$4 million could be spent once the first three-year project is complete.

It remains to be determined how farmers would be compensated for taking

the soil management, manure control and cropping decisions needed to

make farmland more of a sink than a source of carbon emissions.

Meanwhile, the bitter political debate continued in the House of

Commons over whether Canada should ratify the Kyoto Accord in light of

the United States decision not to. The Canadian business lobby argues

it could cost the economy tens of billions of dollars and tens of

thousands of jobs. The oil industry and the Alberta government have

been leading the political charge against ratification.

In the House of Commons, Canadian Alliance environment critic Bob Mills

of Red Deer said there is no proof global warming is the result of

greenhouse gas emission or that the Kyoto Accord would help. The

Alliance is certain it would hurt and should not be approved.

“Money wasted on Kyoto is money that cannot be spent on valuable

adaptation measures,” Mills argued during an opposition-inspired debate

to condemn Kyoto. “Adopting policies that would force up the cost of

energy for farmers will not help them with strategies to deal with

their water shortage.”

Environment minister Anderson rejected Alliance criticisms and said

that after consultations with provinces and industry, Canada must agree

to begin the process of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The Alliance thinks Kyoto will not help the environment, Anderson

complained.

“That is rubbish,” he said. “It is an international agreement involving

179 countries. It is the first step in the process of reversing a trend

that has been taking place for the last 200 years. It is vital that we

start now.”

explore

Stories from our other publications