Farmers applaud pesticide changes

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: March 28, 2002

The federal government’s first major attempt in 33 years to modernize

the rules governing pesticide registration and control has been

applauded by consumer, environmental and farm groups, even as some in

the chemical business worry about the implications.

On March 21, health minister Anne McLellan presented Parliament with a

63-page Pest Control Products Act designed to accomplish several things:

  • Make public more information about product ingredients and testing.

the market in favour of newer, more effective and benign products.

  • Pay more attention to the cumulative effects of chemicals on

children, pregnant women and others at higher risk.

  • Require the Pest Management Regulatory Agency to review every

pesticide on the market no later than 15 years after it is registered.

Along with agriculture minister Lyle Vanclief, McLellan also promised

an announcement soon on a plan to make minor-use products more

available to Canadian farmers.

“What you are seeing here is a recognition of the importance of health

and safety, the importance of the impact of pesticides on the

environment and a refurbishing of our law as it relates to pesticide

legislation,” McLellan told reporters.

Vanclief said later the amendments will make the pesticide regulation

system more transparent and acceptable to consumers and that is good

for farmers.

Farm representatives were generally positive.

“Fundamentally, we’re in favour of any legislation that will continue

to look after the health of the public,” Canadian Federation of

Agriculture president Bob Friesen said. One CFA criticism is that the

bill should have “stronger language” to ensure that farmers have access

to new products if older, less-acceptable products are taken off the

market.

The Ontario environmental farm coalition Agcare also praised the

legislative update, as long as the government works harder to make sure

farmers have the most up-to-date products available.

“Farmers have been very clear about the need for newer, safer

technologies for protecting farm crops from pest damage and we are

pleased to see the emphasis on access to reduced-risk, safer

alternatives for pest control,” Agcare said March 22.

In Toronto, the business association representing pesticide

manufacturers worried that the proposals for more transparency, tougher

rules and the ability of critics to trigger pesticide reviews could

discourage investment and innovation.

“It is speculation until we see all the details but we are concerned

that when foreign companies look at the new disclosure rules and other

parts of this, Canada may fall down the list as a place to invest,”

said Croplife Canada official Peter Macleod.

“We also think the ability for someone to apply for a review of a

product could lead to delays or some mischief making by people who are

hostile to pesticides.”

Still, the majority reaction was that McLellan had struck a reasonable

balance and it is time to get on with the changes.

McLellan said she hopes to see the bill through the House of Commons

and into the Senate by late June when Parliament adjourns for the

summer.

explore

Stories from our other publications