Egg board review goes to minister

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: June 6, 2002

A review of the Saskatchewan Egg Producers will be given to the

provincial agriculture minister Clay Serby on June 7.

Serby had asked agrologist Eugene Bendig in mid-May to look into how

quotas are allocated and transferred, and whether the egg producers

board is complying with the act that regulates it.

The review came after non-quota producers Terry Motz of Glidden and

Curtis Jensen of Milden raised concerns about the board.

They cited an apparent consolidation of quota among a shrinking number

Read Also

Spencer Harris (green shirt) speaks with attendees at the Nutrien Ag Solutions crop plots at Ag in Motion on July 16, 2025. Photo: Greg Berg

Interest in biological crop inputs continues to grow

It was only a few years ago that interest in alternative methods such as biologicals to boost a crop’s nutrient…

of producers, including many currently sitting on the board. They also

questioned how quota was transferred and the length of time spent on

quota waiting lists.

Mitchell Demyen of Saskatchewan Agriculture said the pair leveled

serious allegations of systemic problems at the board, which required

further investigation by the government.

Bendig declined to comment while the review is under way, but Demyen

said the investigation included auditing 20 recent cases of quota

transfer, including those mentioned by Motz and Jensen. Demyen said

Bendig also looked at new quota allocations made during the same period.

Bendig met with Motz and Jensen, and representatives from Saskatchewan

Egg Producers and the Saskatchewan Agri-Food Council, which regulates

the egg organization.

Demyen said Bendig’s job was to determine “if there is any evidence of

noncompliance and if so, what is the nature of it.”

Demyen said the agri-food council usually deals with the egg producers

board only when the board wants to make changes, and isn’t meant to

monitor the board’s activities. An appeal process exists for producers

who don’t agree with the board’s actions, he added.

“It’s up to the people adversely affected to say this is not right and

to appeal.”

Motz disagreed, saying provincial legislation gives the council enough

power to shut the board down.

Following a meeting with Bendig on May 24, Motz said he doesn’t expect

the review to change anything.

He said he is concerned that the review was launched as a precursor to

making legislative changes that will bring it into line with what

already is common practice.

“They’re going to change the legislation to make it legal.”

He said a distinction needs to be made between business value and quota

value. The statutes indicate quota has no value and cannot be sold, but

in practice, those seeking quota look around for those retiring, strike

a deal on the business value, and then ask the board to approve the

transfer of quota.

“We say without quota there is no business value,” Motz said.

He noted the ceiling has been raised for quota producers, but held at

299 birds for non-quota producers, limiting opportunities for

additional revenues for family farms.

“The small producer and small farmer in Saskatchewan might as well pack

up their bags and move to Alberta, because you don’t have a chance in

this province.”

The final report will also look at how eggs were produced when the egg

marketing legislation was passed in 1976 and how it has changed since

then. It will review board minutes, and examine economies of scale,

farm size and competition.

Demyen said it was likely the report’s findings would be made public

because of the large amount of public interest.

About the author

Karen Morrison

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications