Consensus on trail rules a remote possibility

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: October 24, 2002

Nisku, Alta. – After more than 1,000 mailed-in workbooks, nine

workshops, a handful of public meetings and a day-long public forum,

Alberta MLAs charged with developing legislation for recreation trails

in the province are months away from a draft plan that will likely

satisfy no one.

Trying to get a room full of hikers, farmers, trappers, cyclists,

skiers, hunters, snowmobilers, horseback riders, foresters and ranchers

to agree on how the province’s 15,000 kilometres of trails should be

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

managed, or if they’re even needed, is like trying to push the positive

and negative sides of a magnet together. They can be pushed together,

but they won’t stick.

“I like the initiative of the legislative review, but I’m concerned

there are so many divergent issues,” said Eric Harvey of the Bow Valley

Mountain Bike Alliance during a public forum in the Edmonton-area town.

“I don’t know if it will go anywhere.”

Harvey’s biggest concern while cycling on the mountain trails around

Banff is running into a grizzly bear.

For Ted Burger of Arrowwood, past-president of the Alberta Association

of Landowners for the Protection of Agricultural Land, the concern is

more about hikers trespassing on his land, careless smoking near his

farm and having access to farmland across the trail.

“Most of us don’t even want these trails,” said Burger, pointing to a

newly published book as evidence the trails would cause nothing but

trouble.

“There are just so many problems.”

In her book Hiking the Dream, a family’s four month trek along the

TransCanada Trail, Kathy Didkowsky published photos of old farm

buildings the family explored, and the van’s tire tracks where the

family drove through a prairie grain crop.

“She’s really brought out the fact people aren’t going to stay on the

trails and it’s the farmers who are going to have to deal with that.”

Ray Danyluk, chair of the MLA review committee, acknowledged that

opinions are varied.

“They are not like concerns,” Danyluk said. “There are associations in

the room who don’t even believe in trails in Alberta.”

The committee was formed earlier this year to create more uniform

legislation and rules for the trails, which are established on old

railway rights-of-way, undeveloped road allowances and backcountry

trails.

Most of the trails have few rules. The committee is hoping the

legislation would standardize trail location, fees, signs and liability.

Committee member Jon Lord said 30 pieces of legislation refer to trails.

“If it’s just the legislation consolidation alone, it will be a

benefit,” said Lord, who hopes to replace the existing legislation with

a single law.

The committee must also come up with recommendations to deal with

concerns about liability for farms along the trails, trail policing and

increased motorized traffic.

explore

Stories from our other publications