Biotech must cater to consumers, says expert

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: April 4, 2002

VANCOUVER – Proponents of biotechnology are fighting a losing battle

for the public’s hearts and minds, says a Canadian expert on biotech

issues.

And that is resulting in regulations that make it increasingly

difficult to grow and trade genetically modified crops, says Dale

Adolphe of the Canadian Seed Growers Association.

Perhaps the only way to turn the tide of public opinion will be to come

up with a GM commodity that provides a direct benefit to consumers, he

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

said last week.

But he also warned that’s not about to happen soon.

“I don’t think there’s anything on the horizon within five years, and

that’s a long time in terms of regulatory development,” he said.

Adolphe, who gained plenty of experience with GM issues during his

tenure as head of the Canola Council of Canada, said consumer critics

often complain that all the benefits of GM crops go to the

multinational corporations that own the technology or to farmers.

Developing a GM commodity with a trait that provides a direct health or

financial benefit to consumers would go a long way toward blunting that

criticism.

“If we can get a consumer benefit in there, maybe that will shift the

consumers to accept the science.”

Adolphe said it’s frustrating to see unreasonable rules imposed on the

industry in response to ill-informed public opinion.

“We’re losing the battle from the standpoint that regulators are

imposing more and more regulations that have no science basis,” he said

in an interview after speaking to the council’s annual convention.

“There are no food or feed safety issues here, but you’re getting

regulations and traceability schemes imposed on the system.”

Another concern is the push from some groups to identify and label not

only food products that actually contain genetically modified material,

but those that are derived from products that may contain genetically

modified material.

The problem is there is no analytical procedure that can determine on a

scientific basis the presence of such material, so it has to rely on

paper trails involving things like affidavits and identity preserved

systems.

The issue of GM crops was a popular topic in speeches, questions and

coffee-break discussion at the canola council’s two-day convention.

Putting the issue uppermost in some people’s minds was continuing

confusion over new rules imposed by China to control the import of GM

products, rules that some in the industry see as a blatant attempt by

the Chinese government to take advantage of consumer concerns over GM

crops to create new trade barriers.

When that’s added to the continuing refusal by Europe to import GM

canola from Canada, it raises red flags among canola growers and

exporters.

Thomas Mielke, editor of Oil World magazine, said the fight over GM

crops is so difficult because the opponents use emotions, not facts.

“Those who are opinion makers in Europe are on this subject not well

educated,” he said.

They just want to use the GM issue as part of a broader fight against

globalization and multinational corporations, he said.

“It’s more a political issue than a scientific issue,” he said. “How

can you fight those people?”

Adolphe said it’s ironic that even as public protests and opposition to

GM food products seem to grow and even as new regulations and controls

are put in place, the total acreage devoted to GM crops around the

world is expanding.

That may be what eventually brings the debate to an end, said Adolphe.

“It’s a hell of a thing to say that the way we win is don’t give the

consumer a choice, but that might be it.”

He said the canola industry is fortunate for now that it still has

markets willing to take its products without concern over the GM issue,

in Japan, Mexico, the United States, China and the Canadian domestic

market.

“If some of those start to close their doors or put in regulations, it

becomes more difficult,” he said.

About the author

Adrian Ewins

Saskatoon newsroom

explore

Stories from our other publications