Your reading list

Animal cruelty bill in doubt

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: June 20, 2002

The government’s controversial cruelty-to-animals legislation will lie

in limbo over summer after senators decided not to proceed with the

bill.

With persistent rumours that this parliamentary session may be ended by

the government in September to allow a new session, the bill could die

as unfinished business.

“I would not shed a tear if that happened,” Liberal rural caucus chair

and Ontario MP Murray Calder said June 14.

He is at the centre of a dispute over government intentions.

Read Also

Spencer Harris (green shirt) speaks with attendees at the Nutrien Ag Solutions crop plots at Ag in Motion on July 16, 2025. Photo: Greg Berg

Interest in biological crop inputs continues to grow

It was only a few years ago that interest in alternative methods such as biologicals to boost a crop’s nutrient…

When the Liberal majority forced the bill through the House of Commons

June 4 by cutting off debate, Calder successfully urged reluctant rural

Liberals to vote for it because justice minister Martin Cauchon had

promised an amendment in the Senate guaranteeing that normal farm

animal practices would not be at risk.

Once in the Senate, that promise disappeared.

Montreal Liberal senator Joan Fraser was designated to shepherd the

legislation through the Senate and she said there was no such deal.

Opposition senators had complained that Calder’s statement was an

affront to the independence of the Upper Chamber. Canadian Alliance

senator Gerry St. Germain argued it violated the privileges of the

Senate and its independence from the Commons.

The incident left Calder fuming because he had assured other skeptical

rural Liberals that there was a deal.

“I’ll be honest with you, I’m disappointed,” he said. “I will be

speaking to the minister about it.”

explore

Stories from our other publications