Animal cruelty bill clears Commons

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: June 6, 2002

The federal government’s contentious cruelty-to-animals legislation

cleared the House of Commons this week after the federal Liberal

government cut off debate June 3.

It now goes to the Senate, where farm groups will renew their demands

that the bill be amended to make it clear that farmers and ranchers

engaged in normal animal husbandry practices will not be subject to

prosecution.

The Liberals have insisted that the legislation is aimed at real

abusers and not farmers. And some have promised that an amendment will

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

be introduced by the government during Senate hearings to make the

point clear.

Liberal rural caucus chair Murray Calder voted for the legislation June

3 after threatening to vote against it and he said a promise of an

amendment was the reason.

He said he was convinced that justice minister Martin Cauchon will

amend the bill in the Senate. Calder urged other rural Liberals to vote

for the bill.

“The amendment does not give farmers and other animal users the right

to abuse animals,” Calder said June 3.

“We never asked for that. But it does recognize the principle that

farmers and others can use animals for lawful purposes.”

Calder said it was enough of a promise to convince him the legislation

could be supported because farmers are protected from vexatious law

suits by animal rights activists.

Opposition MPs and some rural Liberals have been wary of that claim and

the bill has languished in the House of Commons for months as Canadian

Alliance and Progressive Conservatives demanded an amendment while

supporting the principle of more animal protection.

On Monday, the government forced a vote on ending the debate and won

120 to 71.

Calder’s conversion did not sway all his Liberal rural caucus

compatriots.

MPs Paul Steckle and Rose-Marie Ur did not show up for the vote.

Agriculture committee chair Charles Hubbard, Prince Edward Island MP

Wayne Easter and Ontario MP Bob Speller all supported the legislation.

However, despite the government decision to force a vote and to end the

Canadian Alliance filibuster, it is far from certain that the Senate

will be able to get the bill through the system and into law before the

parliamentary summer recess begins June 21.

If it still is in the system when Parliament adjourns the bill would be

killed.

explore

Stories from our other publications