Your reading list

Canada leads U.S. in livestock ID efforts

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 24, 2005

RED DEER Ñ Canada remains far ahead of the United States when it comes to livestock identification.

“You have no fear of us catching up with you in the short term at least,” said Michael Coe of Global Animal Management, an American company offering a sophisticated form of livestock ID to U.S. producers.

The six-year-old company associated with Schering-Plough Animal Health offers data management systems mostly to feedlots. The company has developed computer software and a database to store records similar to what is used at the Canadian Cattle Identification Agency.

Read Also

close up of calf in a corral, spring 2025. Photo: Janelle Rudolph

Calf hormone implants can give environmental, financial wins

Hormone implants can lead to bigger calves — reducing greenhouse gas intensity, land use intensity and giving the beef farmer more profit, Manitoba-based model suggests.

State veterinarians and staff at the U.S. Department of Agriculture are pushing to identify and plot all premises where animals might reside and identify all mammals, poultry and farmed fish in a variety of ways.

Differences among states remain over how premise numbers might be allocated. Some states want every location where animals are found to be identified and linked to a global positioning system, while others are satisfied using the mailing address.

“It looks very different from what you put in place in Canada,” he said at the annual meeting of Western Stock Growers Association in Red Deer Feb. 17.

The goal is to prevent the spread of disease and it is not linked to country-of-origin labelling laws.

So far in the U.S., any type of identification may be allowed, but government and livestock industries agree it must be an ISO-approved numbering system. Cattle, for example, would carry the U.S. number 840 followed by 12 digits.

Swine and poultry may receive a single lot number indicating where and when the group was assembled.

Coe’s company offers a service where additional information may be attached to the ID numbers. These include birth dates, interstate movement and health tests for tuberculosis and brucellosis. Information needs to be secure to prevent tampering on such data as birthdays.

The electronic system is designed so that as animals move through an auction they can be scanned and recorded almost instantaneously.

Opposition to an animal identification system was strong when the concept was raised a decade ago. After BSE was discovered in the U.S. in December 2003, more producers began to accept the concept.

About the author

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth

Barbara Duckworth has covered many livestock shows and conferences across the continent since 1988. Duckworth had graduated from Lethbridge College’s journalism program in 1974, later earning a degree in communications from the University of Calgary. Duckworth won many awards from the Canadian Farm Writers Association, American Agricultural Editors Association, the North American Agricultural Journalists and the International Agriculture Journalists Association.

explore

Stories from our other publications