How farmer earns $200 per acre

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: January 13, 2000

How can a Saskatchewan grain producer gross $200 per acre, as The Western Producer reported Jan. 6?

Many people have called to ask how Kevin Miller could arrive at that figure as a gross return projection.

It is possible, as proven by numbers in the Canadian Wheat Board December Pool Return Outlook (see WP, Jan. 6, page 15.)

Assume a wheat yield of 50 bushels per acre, which graded No. 1 and had at least 13.5 percent protein, as noted in the story.

The PRO lists the price for that type of wheat at $175 to $205 per tonne. For the sake of figuring, use the midpoint in that range, which is $190 per tonne.

Read Also

Robert Andjelic, who owns 248,000 acres of cropland in Canada, stands in a massive field of canola south of Whitewood, Sask. Andjelic doesn't believe that technical analysis is a useful tool for predicting farmland values | Robert Arnason photo

Land crash warning rejected

A technical analyst believes that Saskatchewan land values could be due for a correction, but land owners and FCC say supply/demand fundamentals drive land prices – not mathematical models

From that, subtract approximately $50 for handling costs, leaving a figure of $140 per tonne.

To convert dollars per tonne to dollars per bushel, divide by a factor of 36.744. That works out to $3.81 per bushel. At 50 bu./acre, the gross is $190.50 per acre.

No, it’s still not $200 an acre. But as stated in the story, the grain producer got yields of 50 bu./acre or better, and protein levels of 13.5 percent and up.

Assuming 55 bu./acre of 13.5 percent protein, the new figure is $209.55 per acre.

As another example, assume 50 bu./acre of 14.5 percent protein, again using the PRO midpoint for that grade, which is $208 per tonne. Again, subtract $50 per tonne for handling. That is $158 per tonne. Converted, that’s $4.30 a bu., multiplied by 50 bu./acre, for a gross yield per acre of $215.

explore

Stories from our other publications