Your reading list

Nitrogen goes down the drain in U.S.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: February 3, 2011

,

Millions of acres of tile drainage in the U.S. Midwest have contributed to a 15,000 sq. kilometre dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, says a U.S. professor.

Mark David, a natural resources professor at the University of Illinois, said tiles are a source of soluble nitrates, which enter the Mississippi River and eventually dump an excessive amount of nutrients into the Gulf of Mexico.

Once in the gulf, the nutrients consume most of the oxygen in the water, leading to a condition called hypoxia that kills aquatic life.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

David attempted to get a better handle on how nitrogen enters the gulf by calculating all the nitrogen inputs and outputs from each county in the Mississippi River basin from 1997 to 2006.

He concluded that tile drainage isn’t the only environmental villain in this story. Rather, it’s part of a leaky agricultural system in the United States that permits nitrates to flow rapidly into streams, rivers and oceans.

“Tile drains don’t automatically mean that you’re going to lose nitrates,” said David, whose study, Sources of Nitrate Yields in the Mississippi River Basin, was published last fall in theJournal of Environmental Quality.

“But there’s no doubt that tile drainage, because it’s moving the water so well, if you have any nitrate in there, it can move with (the water).”

He said ripping out tile drainage isn’t an option, but producers will need to adopt beneficial management practices to reduce the amount of nitrates coming from tiled fields:

• timing of fertilizer applications;

• applying some fertilizer during spring seeding and side dressing as needed after planting;

• incorporating a cover crop into the rotation;

• constructing a small wetland at the end of the pipe.

However, David said someone will have to pay for those improvements.

“All those things can work but they cost money,” he said.

“If we want to reduce nitrate, we’re going to have to help farmers do it…. So maybe provide some (financial) incentive… to help minimize the nitrate loss.”

About the author

Robert Arnason

Robert Arnason

Reporter

Robert Arnason is a reporter with The Western Producer and Glacier Farm Media. Since 2008, he has authored nearly 5,000 articles on anything and everything related to Canadian agriculture. He didn’t grow up on a farm, but Robert spent hundreds of days on his uncle’s cattle and grain farm in Manitoba. Robert started his journalism career in Winnipeg as a freelancer, then worked as a reporter and editor at newspapers in Nipawin, Saskatchewan and Fernie, BC. Robert has a degree in civil engineering from the University of Manitoba and a diploma in LSJF – Long Suffering Jets’ Fan.

explore

Stories from our other publications