Politicians, investors, ag tech companies, industry consultants and representatives of the crop science industry say Canada’s regulatory system has a bad reputation.
They claim politics and public opinion are influencing Health Canada decisions around pesticides and new technologies such as gene edited crops, and that the regulatory process has become unpredictable and unclear.
Related stories on this issue:
- Death by consultation
- Canadian ag tech firms avoid domestic market
- August 2021 called turning point for crop protection regulation
Read Also
Heat waves combine sunshine and sinking air
As we continue our look at heat waves, I figured we should first define what they are by looking at the criteria Environment Canada uses to define heat events.
Because of the regulatory roadblocks, some Canadian companies with new crop protection products and novel crop genetics are going to market in the U.S, but not in Canada.
Health Canada disagrees.
The Pest Management Regulatory Agency has a “strong reputation … around the world” for its science-based decisions, a spokesperson said in an email.
“(The) PMRA … continues to uphold its commitment of making sound, rigorous, evidence-based decisions. Our data requirements and performance standards are highly aligned with our international partners, including the United States,” she said.
Further, the data shows that Health Canada decisions happen at the same speed as other jurisdictions.
“Our… review timelines are largely aligned with other OECD countries,” she said.
Health Canada’s complete response can be found in the Nov. 16 issue of The Western Producer, here.
Contact robert.arnason@producer.com
