Clydesdale judge looks at finer details

By 
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Published: August 8, 2002

AUSTIN, Man. – Watching the judging of draft horses in a show class can

be a lot like sitting on the sidelines at a figure skating competition.

Both events can be fascinating to watch, but understanding the nuances

that decide which horse takes the ribbon can be difficult.

Jim Emmons, a horse breeder and judge, seemed to have the whole thing

down pat during the judging of the Clydesdale Classic in Austin two

weeks ago. The event was part of the annual Threshermen’s Reunion,

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

where demonstrations of vintage farm equipment ran for much of the week.

On July 24, Emmons was in the show ring sizing up some of the finest

draft horses on the Prairies.

There were more than a dozen classes to judge that day. During several

of the classes, each horse was led prancing away from Emmons before

being turned and led back.

Then the horses were lined up facing the grandstand, and Emmons,

dressed in a shirt, tie and navy blue dress pants, would wend his way

among the entrants.

The judging was swift, and once his mind made up, Emmons would jab his

index finger in the direction of the winner and signal for the horse

and owner to come forward.

He was obviously in his element, which would come as no surprise to the

people who know him. Emmons began showing horses at the county fair

when he was a kid back in the 1950s and today, he remains part of the

dedicated fraternity of that shows and judges draft horses at

exhibitions across North America.

Emmons was obliging when asked about the things he looks for when

judging draft horses.

He looks for the same things prairie ancestors would have looked for

when buying a horse to till their fields or tow a wagon loaded with

sheaves: a sound animal that looks like it can deliver plenty of

pulling power.

When the horses are in motion, he pays a lot of attention to their

hocks. The movement and amount of lift in the hocks are important.

“The work horse that keeps its hocks together has more pulling power,”

he says.

His trained eyes also look for things like a toe that is turned in and

a heel that turns out when the horse is plodding away from him. Those

kinds of things can detract from the soundness of a horse as it ages.

When the horses are stationary, Emmons does what a horse buyer would

do. He starts at the front, beginning with a look at the eyes to make

sure they are both “functional.”

From then on it becomes an appraisal of bones and muscle: Do the cannon

bones run straight down from the knees? What are the length of the

pasterns? Is the back level? How wide are the hips on the mares? Wider

hips should mean easier birthing.

The limbs of the horses undergo some of the closest scrutiny.

“The old adage is: no feet, no horse,” says Emmons, while sipping a

cola after the judging.

“A great horse with poor feet won’t stay sound as long.”

According to Emmons, politics rarely enter into horse judging. If a

judge shows a bias to an acquaintance or buddy, word soon gets around.

“I don’t care what the nationality is,” he says, laughing a little as

he remembers the fiasco that erupted at the 2002 Winter Olympics, where

questionable judging almost cost a Canadian figure skating couple

their gold medal.

About the author

Ian Bell

Brandon bureau

explore

Stories from our other publications