Advisory committee needs more clout to be taken seriously: Reform

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: June 30, 1994

OTTAWA (Staff) — Prairie grain farmers would be more careful with their votes if they knew the Canadian Wheat Board advisory committee had real power, said Reform MP Leon Benoit (Vegreville).

As it stands, the committee has no real power, and farmers consistently elect a committee majority strongly in favor of orderly marketing and expanded wheat board powers, he said.

The Reform Party believes the board should be farmer-run with fewer restrictions on farmer options and more market competition for the board.

At the same time, it promotes the importance of more farmer democracy and less reliance on the advice of farm leaders with vested interests and inflexible positions. During a news conference, Benoit made a pitch for more farmer democracy.

Read Also

Agriculture ministers have agreed to work on improving AgriStability to help with trade challenges Canadian farmers are currently facing, particularly from China and the United States. Photo: Robin Booker

Agriculture ministers agree to AgriStability changes

federal government proposed several months ago to increase the compensation rate from 80 to 90 per cent and double the maximum payment from $3 million to $6 million

Why then, he was asked, doesn’t Reform change its views on the CWB, since farmers vote for advisory committee members with views quite different from Reform. Isn’t this the kind of direct farmer democracy that Reform promotes?

Benoit suggested the advisory committee elections do not produce candidates who really reflect farmers’ views about the need for more market options. He suggested farmers do not take the advisory committee or the elections seriously.

explore

Stories from our other publications