Farmers offered money to adopt practices that store carbon in the soil, but experts doubt the approach will be effective
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — President Joe Biden’s administration is offering farmers money to adopt practices that store carbon in the soil to fight climate change, but soil science experts and a review of U.S. Department of Agriculture research indicate doubt that the approach will be effective.
Planting cover crops and reducing tillage are key to the USDA’s plan to slash agriculture’s 10 per cent contribution to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions as the U.S. pursues net-zero by 2050. Ethanol producers also hope those practices will help them secure lucrative tax credits for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) passed in the Inflation Reduction Act.
Read Also
Canada’s plant hardiness zones receive update
The latest update to Canada’s plant hardiness zones and plant hardiness maps was released this summer.
But the farming techniques, which will receive an extra funding boost from Biden’s signature climate law, may not permanently sequester much atmospheric carbon in the soil, according to five soil scientists and researchers who spoke about the science.
Four other soil scientists, and the USDA, said the practices can store various amounts of soil carbon, but circumstances will dictate how much and for how long.
“The adoption and persistent use of no-till and cover crops are key for the sequestration of carbon on working croplands,” said a USDA spokesperson.
All experts interviewed by Reuters agreed that no-till and cover crops can have significant environmental benefits, such as preventing soil erosion and increasing biodiversity. Yet five of them expressed skepticism about tying climate policy and public money to the practices.
“Will it help with climate adaptation? Absolutely. Should it serve as an offset for more permanent and long-lived pollutants? Absolutely not,” said Daniel Rath, an agricultural soil carbon scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The USDA has spent $1.3 billion in financial assistance to farmers for planting and managing cover crops and $224 million for implementing no- or reduced-till since 2014, according to agency data. That figure is minuscule compared to total USDA spending, but does amount to about eight per cent of its farm conservation spending in that period.
“If we really want to offset or mitigate climate change, we need to think about different systems,” said Humberto Blanco, an agronomy professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. “We need to think about more aggressive strategies.”
Adoption of cover crops and no-till has risen in the past decade; now, 11 per cent of farms plant cover crops and about 40 per cent use minimal or no tilling, according to the most recent USDA agricultural census.
Under the right conditions, both practices can be positive for the climate, said scientists.
“If a farmer is using cover crops and getting good growth in the fall and spring, and they’re doing minimal tillage, on most soils, they’re going to add soil carbon over time,” said Robert Myers, a professor at the University of Missouri and regional director of extension programs at a USDA research site.
Five other experts said no-till farming commonly results in a higher concentration of carbon in the soil surface but a decrease deeper in the profile, resulting in a net zero gain.
Seven experts said the climate benefits of no-till and cover crop techniques can be lessened or reversed if farmers plow their fields again.
“Even if you do build up some extra carbon under reduced tillage, if you then do a traditional plowing, the evidence seems to be that you quite quickly lose the carbon that you’ve been building up,” said David Powlson, senior fellow at Rothamsted Research, an agricultural research institution.
Only 21 per cent of farmers report using no-till continuously, according to the 2022 farm census, and about a third alternate reduced tilling with conventional tilling, a 2018 USDA report showed.
A USDA standards document for no-till says loss of carbon in the soil is directly tied to the amount and intensity of tillage, and other factors like soil moisture and temperature.
As for the SAF tax credit, the Treasury Department is expected to finalize details in coming weeks. The $1.25 per gallon credit is aimed at producers who prove their fuel can cut emissions 50 per cent from those of straight jet fuel.
The program will likely require ethanol producers to source corn from farmers using cover crops, reduced tilling or efficient fertilizer application. The USDA declined to comment on what the fertilizer application would entail.
