Your reading list

Computer model predicts plant disease

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Published: July 25, 2002

WINNIPEG – This summer marks the first time wheat and canola producers

across the Prairies have access to plant disease forecast maps based on

computer models of their regions.

In some cases, the disease maps are specific down to the field level.

Disease forecast maps warn producers of imminent plant disease

outbreaks that might require treatment. If plant disease probability is

low, the maps help producers decide if they can safely skip an

expensive fungicide application.

Read Also

Chris Nykolaishen of Nytro Ag Corp

VIDEO: Green Lightning and Nytro Ag win sustainability innovation award

Nytro Ag Corp and Green Lightning recieved an innovation award at Ag in Motion 2025 for the Green Lightning Nitrogen Machine, which converts atmospheric nitrogen into a plant-usable form.

The disease forecast maps, produced by the Agrometeorological Centre of

Excellence based in Carman. Man., predict the probability of

sclerotinia in canola and fusarium head blight in wheat. The Western

Producer is carrying the maps until the plant disease risk subsides.

The predictions are generated by computer models based on factors such

as the amount and duration of rainfall, humidity, local disease

history, temperature, local soil types, leaf moisture, wind and time.

Manitoba data is fed into the computer every 15 minutes from a network

of 200 reporting stations located in farmers’ fields. Each field

station is programmed to collect information relevant to that area.

The program is still in its infancy in Saskatchewan, where 30 reporting

stations went on-line this spring, and Alberta where 15 stations were

activated this year.

“For 2002, we have more accurate predictions in Manitoba simply

because we have so many data collection points transmitting

information,” said ACE co-ordinator Andrew Nadler.

He said data for Saskatchewan and Alberta come mainly from Environment

Canada stations, so these forecasts are more regional rather than

specific to an exact location.

“As we get more stations in Saskatchewan and Alberta, we’ll produce

more specific forecasting maps in those provinces.”

He said the long-range goal is to develop a continuous network of

stations in farmers’ fields right across the Prairies.

Nadler said Environment Canada had been developing software for the

fusarium and sclerotinia computer models for a number of years before

ACE came on the scene.

“They had the canola computer model all worked out, but they needed

more precise input data from a larger number of stations. That’s

something we were able to provide, so we transferred their canola model

into our system. It’s working extremely well.”

The ACE computer is also running software for an alfalfa model, which

determines relative feed value and recommends when to cut.

The forage field stations collect data on growing degree days and

transmit the information to the computer in Carman. Producers can dial

in requirements for dairy cows, dairy calves, export hay or various

beef options. The central computer tracks the stage of plant

development and sends the information to the producers’.

When the ACE system started, it was designed primarily to provide

disease forecasting information to Manitoba potato producers. Because

potatoes usually require a dozen or more fungicide treatments per year,

there was an obvious need for better information on disease

thresholds. Potato growers on the system say it has proven to be a

valuable crop management tool.

Nadler said ACE is working with the Potato Growers Association of

Alberta and is looking at possible expansion into the irrigated areas

of Alberta and Outlook, Sask.

“We also have some very good software for predicting disease in

chickpeas, so that’s another thing that can provide an immediate

benefit in Saskatchewan.”

In areas where ACE has field stations, individual farmers can subscribe

and have a station on their land for an annual fee of $2,850. They get

a daily report on conditions specific to that farm. And in many cases,

a group of producers with adjacent farmland have joined together to

share the cost of one field station.

Producers who farm close to an existing ACE field station can subscribe

for $500 per year and receive all reports from their neighbour’s

station.

About the author

Ron Lyseng

Ron Lyseng

Western Producer

explore

Stories from our other publications